News Column

Pretium Resources Inc.: Positive Feasibility Study Completed for Brucejack High-Grade Gold Project

Page 5 of 1

LogoTracker

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 06/11/13 -- Pretium Resources Inc. (TSX: PVG)(NYSE: PVG) ("Pretivm") is pleased to announce a positive National Instrument 43-101-compliant Feasibility Study for the high-grade gold and silver resources identified to date at its 100%-owned Brucejack Project ("Brucejack" or the "Project") in northern British Columbia. The Feasibility Study was prepared by Tetra Tech.

Highlights (base case using US$1,350/oz gold, US$20/oz silver and exchange rate of US$/C$: 1)

-- Valley of the Kings Probable Mineral Reserves of 6.6 million ounces of gold (15.1 million tonnes grading 13.6 grams of gold per tonne) and West Zone Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 700,000 ounces of gold (3.8 million tonnes grading 5.8 grams of gold per tonne);-- Average annual production of 425,700 ounces of gold over the first 10 years and 321,500 ounces of gold over the life of mine;-- Base Case pre-tax Net Present Value (5% discount) of US$2.7 billion;-- Base Case pre-tax Internal Rate of Return of 42.9%, with payback estimated at 2.1 years;-- Mine life of 22 years producing an estimated 7.1 million ounces of gold;-- Estimated project capital cost, including contingencies, of US$663.5 million;-- Average operating costs of C$156.46/tonne milled over mine life.Table 1: Summary of Brucejack High-Grade Economic Results by Metal Price---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alternative Base Case Spot Prices Case (1) at June 06, 2013----------------------------------------------------------------------------Gold Price (US$/ounce) $ 800 $ 1,350 $ 1,415.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Silver Price (US$/ounce) $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 22.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Net $ 1.41 billion $ 5.28 billion $ 5.90 billionCash Flow (pre-tax) (pre-tax) (pre-tax) $ 964.1 million $ 3.50 billion $ 3.91 billion (post-tax) (post-tax) (post-tax)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Net Present $ 602.3 million $ 2.69 billion $ 3.01 billion Value(2) (pre-tax) (pre-tax) (pre-tax)(5.0% $ 383.7 million $ 1.76 billion $ 1.98 billion discount) (post-tax) (post-tax) (post-tax)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Internal Rate 16.6% (pre-tax) 42.9% (pre-tax) 47.0%(pre-tax)of Return 13.7% (post-tax) 35.7% (post-tax) 39.2% (post-tax)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Payback (from 4.7 years (pre-tax) 2.1 years (pre-tax) 1.9 years (pre-tax) start ofproduction 4.8 years (post- 2.2 years (post- 2.0 years (post- period) tax) tax) tax)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Exchange Rate (US$:C$) 1.00 1.00 0.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------(1) Tetra Tech-adopted consensus forecast metal prices from the Energy Metals Consensus Forecast (EMCF).(2) NPV is discounted to the beginning of 2013.



Project Mineral Reserves

The Mineral Reserves resulting from the Feasibility Study for the Brucejack Project are based on the November 2012 Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings and the West Zone (see news release dated November 20, 2012). The Mineral Reserve estimates by zone and Reserve category are summarized below.

Table 2: Valley of the Kings Mineral Reserve Estimate(3)(4) - May 16th, 2013---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contained -------------------------------- Tonnes Gold Silver Gold SilverCategory (millions) (g/t) (g/t) (million oz) (million oz)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Probable 15.1 13.6 11.0 6.6 5.3----------------------------------------------------------------------------(3) Rounding of some figures may lead to minor discrepancies in totals.(4) Based on C$180/t cutoff grade, US$ 1350/oz Au price, US$ 22/oz Ag price, C$/US$ exchange rate = 1.0Table 3: West Zone Mineral Reserve Estimate(5) - May 16th, 2013---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contained -------------------------------- Tonnes Gold Silver Gold SilverCategory (millions) (g/t) (g/t) (million oz) (million oz)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Proven 2.0 5.7 309 0.4 19.9----------------------------------------------------------------------------Probable 1.8 5.8 172 0.3 10.1----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total P&P 3.8 5.8 243 0.7 30.0----------------------------------------------------------------------------(5) See notes (3) and (4) to Table 2 above.



Mining and Processing

Brucejack is planned as a high-grade underground mining operation using a long-hole stoping mining method and cemented paste backfill. The Valley of the Kings, the higher-grade, primary targeted deposit, will be developed first; the lower-grade West Zone will be developed in the second half of the Project's 22-year mine life. The mine is planned to operate with a processing rate of 2,700 tonnes per day and mine a total of 9.6 million tonnes of ore for the first 10 years at an average mill feed grade of 14.2 grams gold per tonne.

Mineral processing will involve conventional sulphide flotation and gravity concentration, producing gold-silver dore and gold-silver flotation concentrate. Metallurgical recoveries for the Valley of the Kings are 96.7% for gold and 84.8% for silver, and for the West Zone 94.7% for gold and 90.4% for silver. A total of 7.1 million ounces of gold and 31.6 million ounces of silver is estimated to be produced over the life of the Brucejack Project, including the gold and silver recovered into the flotation concentrate. The Project's projected production and processing is summarized in Table 4 below.

Table 4: Brucejack Project Total Mine Projected Production and Processing Summary(6)---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gold Silver Gold Silver Production, Production, Tonnage, grade, grade, ('000 ('000Year (t) (g/t) (g/t) ounces) ounces)----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 811,000(7) 15.4 12 388 271----------------------------------------------------------------------------2 937,000 13.8 11 403 284----------------------------------------------------------------------------3 979,000 13.1 11 400 294----------------------------------------------------------------------------4 981,000 15.8 12 483 314----------------------------------------------------------------------------5 983,000 17.1 14 523 364----------------------------------------------------------------------------6 986,000 12.7 9 389 235----------------------------------------------------------------------------7 985,000 15.5 11 474 306----------------------------------------------------------------------------8 985,000 14.0 10 427 265----------------------------------------------------------------------------9 980,000 14.0 11 427 303----------------------------------------------------------------------------10 991,000 11.2 18 343 490----------------------------------------------------------------------------Years 1-10 9,618,000 14.2 12 4,257 3,126----------------------------------------------------------------------------Years 11-22 9,368,000 9.7 105 2,816 28,515----------------------------------------------------------------------------Life of Mine (Years 1-22) 18,986,000 12.0 57.9 7,073 31,641----------------------------------------------------------------------------(6) Rounding of some figures may lead to minor discrepancies in totals.(7) Tonnage includes pre-production ore.



Capital and Operating Costs

The capital cost for the Brucejack high-grade project is estimated at US$663.5 million, including a contingency of US$ 64.4 million. Capital costs are summarized in Table 5 below.

Table 5: Capital Costs Summary----------------------------------------------- (US$ million)-----------------------------------------------Mine underground 174.5-----------------------------------------------Mine site(8) 208.2-----------------------------------------------Offsite Infrastructure 69.1-----------------------------------------------Total Direct Costs 451.8-----------------------------------------------Indirect Costs 125.0-----------------------------------------------Owner's Costs 22.3-----------------------------------------------Contingencies 64.4-----------------------------------------------Total Capital Cost 663.5-----------------------------------------------



(8) Includes mine site, mine site process, mine site utilities, mine site facilities, tailings facilities, mine site temporary facilities and surface mobile equipment.

Average operating cost is estimated at C$156.46 per tonne milled. Operating costs are summarized in Table 6 below.

Table 6: Operating Costs Summary----------------------------------------------- (C$/tonne)-----------------------------------------------Mining 93.18(9)-----------------------------------------------Processing 18.16-----------------------------------------------General & Administrative 25.47-----------------------------------------------Surface Services and Others 19.65-----------------------------------------------Total Operating Cost 156.46-----------------------------------------------



(9) LOM ore milled; if excluding the ore mined during preproduction, the estimated cost is C$94.40/t.

All-In sustaining cash costs, which include by-product cash costs, sustaining capital, exploration expense and reclamation cost accretion are summarized in Table 7 below.

Table 7: All-In Sustaining Cash Costs Life of Mine---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (US$ million)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total Cash Costs(10) $3,253----------------------------------------------------------------------------Reclamation Cost Accretion $25.7----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sustaining Capital Expenditure $328.5----------------------------------------------------------------------------All-in Sustaining Cash Costs $3,607.2----------------------------------------------------------------------------Gold Sales 7.1 million ounces----------------------------------------------------------------------------All-in Sustaining Cash Costs per Ounce $508/ounce----------------------------------------------------------------------------(10) Net of silver credits at Base Case silver price of $20/ounce.



For a view of the figures illustrating the sensitivity analyses for the Project's Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return and Payback using the parameters of metals prices, exchange rate, capital costs and operating costs please see the following link: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/pvg611_F1-3.pdf.

Opportunities for Enhanced Economics

The capital cost includes $49.9 million for a 50 kilometer-long transmission line. An evaluation of the cost benefits of alternatively entering into a build-own-maintain agreement for the construction and operation of the transmission line is now underway.

The capital cost associated with the plant site construction is also being evaluated for potential savings in optimizing the site layout.

The Project timeline is being reviewed for opportunities to accelerate underground development.

Next Steps

The results of the 10,000-tonne Bulk Sample Program currently underway at Brucejack's Valley of the Kings are expected later in the year.

Pretivm will continue to advance engineering at the Brucejack Project in support of the ongoing permitting process, and anticipates filing its application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate later this year.

After obtaining permits, and subject to a production decision, Pretivm anticipates commencing construction of the mine in the second half of 2014.

The Technical Report for the Brucejack Project Feasibility Study is expected to be filed on SEDAR this month and will also be available at www.pretivm.com.

Ian I Chang, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Vice President, Project Development, Pretium Resources Inc. is the Qualified Person (QP) responsible for Brucejack Project development.

Independent Qualified Persons

The following Qualified Persons as defined by National Instrument 43-101 are independent of Pretivm and responsible for the Technical Report and Feasibility Study of the Brucejack Project:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Qualified Person Scope of Responsibility----------------------------------------------------------------------------David Ireland, C.Eng., P.Eng. Site Infrastructure and ProjectTetra Tech Execution----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ivor W.O. Jones, M.Sc., CP, FAusIMM Geology and Mineral ResourcesSnowden Mining Industry Consultants----------------------------------------------------------------------------Colm Keogh, P.Eng. Mineral Reserves and MethodsAMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Huang, Ph.D, P.Eng. Metallurgy and Recovery MethodsTetra Tech----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Gould, P.Eng. Avalanche Hazard AssessmentAlpine Solutions Avalanche Services----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Wise, P.Eng. Transmission LineValard----------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Greisman, Ph.D., P.Eng. Tailings delivery system andRescan aspects of Brucejack Creek suspended solids control----------------------------------------------------------------------------Pierre Pelletier, P.Eng. Aspects of environmental, social,Rescan community studies, and permitting----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wayne Stoyko, P.Eng. Capital Cost EstimateTetra Tech----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sabry Abdel Hafez, Ph.D, P.Eng. Financial AnalysisTetra Tech----------------------------------------------------------------------------Cathy Schmid, P.Eng. Underground Mine GeotechnicalBGC Engineering Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Virginia Cullen, M.Eng., P.Eng. Hydrogeological / GroundwaterBGC Engineering Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hamish Weatherly, P.Geo. Water ManagementBGC Engineering Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jan Gertis, Ph.D. Water QualityBGC Engineering Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mo Molavi, P.Eng. Underground InfrastructureAMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Maureen McGuinness, P.Eng Paste Backfill DistributionPaterson & Cooke Canada Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brent McAfee, P.Eng. Site GeotechnicalBGC Engineering Inc.----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Chin, P.Eng. Earthworks, roads, and drainage atTetra Tech the mine site and at Knipple Transfer Station----------------------------------------------------------------------------



About Pretivm

Pretivm is creating value through gold at its high-grade gold Brucejack Project, located in northern British Columbia. Brucejack hosts a major undeveloped high-grade gold resource, with Probable Mineral Reserves in the Valley of the Kings totalling 6.6 million ounces of gold (15.1 million tonnes grading 13.6 grams of gold per tonne). Brucejack is being advanced as a high-grade underground mine with an average of 426,000 ounces of gold produced annually for the first 10 years and an average of 321,500 million ounces of gold produced annually over the Project's 22-year mine life. Commercial production is targeted to commence in 2016.

Forward-Looking Statements

This News Release contains "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, risks related to our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of Pretivm's financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resource estimates, timing of development of Pretivm's Brucejack Project, costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration and drilling, production and processing estimates, capital and operating cost estimates, timelines and similar statements relating to the economic viability of the Brucejack Project, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, Pretivm's executive compensation approach and practice, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as "plans", "expects", "projects", "assumes", "budget", "strategy", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "anticipates", "believes", "intends" and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative forms of any of these terms and similar expressions, have been used to identify forward-looking statements and information. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information, including, without limitation, those risks identified in Pretivm's prospectus supplement to the short form base shelf prospectus dated March 19, 2012 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and in the United States through EDGAR at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking information is based on the expectations and opinions of Pretivm's management on the date the statements are made. The assumptions used in the preparation of such statements, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise. We do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

The TSX has neither approved nor disapproved of the information contained herein.



Contacts:
Pretium Resources Inc.
Robert Quartermain
President and Chief Executive Officer
(604) 558-1784

Pretium Resources Inc.
Michelle Romero
Corporate Relations Director
(604) 558-1784
invest@pretivm.com
www.pretivm.com