News Column

Endeavour Silver Reports First Quarter 2013 Financial Results, Conference Call at 10 am PDT (1 pm EDT) on May 7, 2013

Page 5 of 8

Forward-looking statements or information involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Endeavour and its operations to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such factors include, among others, changes in national and local governments, legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or economic developments in Canada and Mexico; operating or technical difficulties in mineral exploration, development and mining activities; risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development and mining; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, risks in obtaining necessary licenses and permits, and challenges to the Company's title to properties; as well as those factors described in the section "risk factors" contained in the Company's most recent form 40F/Annual Information Form filed with the S.E.C. and Canadian securities regulatory authorities.

Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable, including but not limited to: the continued operation of the Company's mining operations, no material adverse change in the market price of commodities, mining operations will operate and the mining products will be completed in accordance with management's expectations and achieve their stated production outcomes, and such other assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or information, there may be other factors that cause results to be materially different from those anticipated, described, estimated, assessed or intended. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements or information will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements or information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.

ENDEAVOUR SILVER CORP.

COMPARATIVE TABLE OF CONSOLIDATED MINE OPERATIONS

Comparative Table of Consolidated Mine Operations----------------------------------------------------------------------------            Plant                                                Cash DirectPeriod      T'put    Ore Grades   Recovered Ounces  Recoveries   Cost   Cost----------------------------------------------------------------------------                      Ag     Au         Ag      Au    Ag    Au  $ per  $ per           Tonnes   (gpt)  (gpt)       (oz)    (oz)   (%)   (%)    oz  tonne----------------------------------------------------------------------------Production2013 Year:Q1, 2013  376,344    154   1.51  1,489,746  15,032  79.9  82.3  10.04  99.63Q2, 2013Q3, 2013Q4, 2013----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total     376,344    154   1.51  1,489,746  15,032  79.9  82.3  10.04  99.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------Production2012 Year:Q1, 2012  193,759    229   1.33  1,072,491   6,321  75.2  76.2   6.26  92.44Q2, 2012  202,987    208   1.47  1,040,026   7,695  76.5  80.3   5.46  86.32Q3, 2012  306,164    161   1.49  1,137,933  11,754  71.8  80.1   4.70  97.04Q4, 2012  362,779    151   1.55  1,235,026  12,917  70.1  71.7  12.25  92.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total   1,065,689    179   1.48  4,485,476  38,687  73.2  76.5   7.33  92.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Q1, 2013:     94%   -33%    13%        39%    138%    6%    8%    60%     8%Q1, 2012--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Q1, 2013:      4%     2%    -2%        21%     16%   14%   15%   -18%     7%Q4, 2012--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------YTD 2013:     94%   -33%    13%        39%    138%    6%    8%    60%     8%YTD 2012----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continued | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next >>

Story Tools