Penney declined to comment.
Former employees said Mr. Johnson was personable and his plans
were intriguing. Ken Murphy, senior vice president at Standard Life
Investments, said that "many retailers, while openly cautious and
dismissive of the JCP experiment, were actually nervously watching
JCP's plans unfold with some concern that if their strategy worked,
the industry would be required to adapt faster than expected to a
new trend in retailing."
By early autumn 2011, Mr. Johnson was tackling Penney's pricing,
which he thought used too many discounts. He ignored a study Penney
had just completed on customer preferences and gave merchants a one-
sheet grid explaining what prices they could use.
"Ron's response at the time was, just like at Apple, customers
don't always know what they want," said an executive who advocated
testing. "We're not going to test it -- we're going to roll it out."
Suddenly, employees were changing price tags on tens of thousands
of items. When an executive warned that Mr. Johnson's sales
projections for the coming quarter were too optimistic, he declined
to adjust them, the executive said. When the new pricing was
introduced in 2012, sales fell.
Mr. Johnson believed his taste was paramount, executives said. In
January 2012, Penney unveiled its new strategy at Pier 57 in New
York, covering the room in pure white to signal that Mr. Johnson
brought "fresh air" to Penney. The day before the event, Mr. Johnson
tried out the attendees' chairs, found them lacking and paid to have
them replaced with folding chairs suitable for a wedding.
Similarly, as Penney designed its in-store boutiques, Mr. Johnson
pushed for the best shelving and signage, though cheaper options
were fine, an employee said. Recently, Penney has backtracked on
that, asking vendors to cover the costs for the in-store shops as it
runs low on cash.
In a push to make Penney into, as Mr. Johnson called it,
Bloomingdale's for Middle America, he ordered merchandising
executives to move away from frumpy categories like maternity wear
and toward slim-fit polos and European-cut suits -- despite the fact
that many shoppers went to Penney for figure-forgiving basics,
according to two former executives.
He got rid of about 400 existing brands. In case shoppers were
not getting the point that they weren't good enough, Penney ran an
Oscars ad telling customers they "deserve to look better." "If
you're a certain customer and you've been shopping Penney's, that's
kind of insulting," a former executive said. "You're going to come
in and say, there's nothing for me."
One of Mr. Johnson's most prominent partnerships, with Martha
Stewart, puzzled employees. He decided that to remake Penney, he
needed to remake the home department and do it with Ms. Stewart --
who had an exclusive contract with Macy's.
"Martha is the key," he wrote in an October 2011 e-mail to
himself. That December, Penney announced it was taking a 16.6
percent stake in Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia and would carry her
housewares in its stores.
He did not ask for input from his staff on some promises he made
to Ms. Stewart, like building her an e-commerce site or how her
boutiques inside Penney stores would look. By January 2012, Macy's
had sued.
A lengthy and expensive court battle is in progress; a Citigroup
report estimates that liquidating the purchased inventory could cost
Penney $100 million.
Mr. Johnson directed a "simplification" team to get rid of many
of Penney's longstanding processes. In 2012, he revoked access to
Penney's sales data for all but the top executives. But that took
away valuable information: The buyer for, say, men's big and tall
could not see how women's plus size was performing. As sales
tumbled, executives said, Mr. Johnson finally seemed inclined to
listen.
"Once his strategy got rolled out," said a former employee, "he
would ask all the time: 'What do you think? Do you think it's
working?"'
Though Mr. Johnson was quick to make changes, like abandoning the
"simple" pricing strategy and reinstituting promotions, it was too
late. For 2012, Penney's revenue dropped 25 percent, to $13 billion.
The problems are persisting in the current quarter. Michael
Binetti, an analyst at UBS, said that he believed new introductions
like Joe Fresh apparel were not hitting sales targets and that the
heavy discounting Penney had resorted to suggested that sales were
way down.
The continued slump probably forced the board's hand. Over the
weekend, the chairman made his first contact with Mr. Ullman about
taking back the wheel from Mr. Johnson.
"His hubris finally did him in," one former executive said.
Most Popular Stories
- Summer Movie Forecast: Biggest Box Office Season Yet for 3D Movies
- Fox, Twitter Team Up to Promote TV Shows, Sell Ads
- One Hot Summer as Theater Season Opens
- Cinedigm and Universal Studios Home Entertainment Enter Into Multiyear Home Entertainment Distribution Relationship
- iPhone 6 'Appears' on Vodafone U.K. Store as '4G iPhone 6'
- Hispanics Wanted in STEM Careers
- Nikki Hill Brings Raw Energy to Roanoke
- Boman Modine Launches Kickstarter Campaign for Film About Cystic Fibrosis
- Guitar Center Sessions Updates on New Episodes Featuring The Smashing Pumpkins, Goo Goo Dolls, OneRepublic and Talib Kweli
- OSN Strengthens Regional Footprint With New Flagship Showroom in Kuwait
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
Swagger Didn't Sell at Penney -- Now What?
Page 2 of 2
For more stories covering business, please see HispanicBusiness' Business Channel
Source: (C) 2013 International Herald Tribune. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved
1 | 2 | Next >>
Story Tools



