News Column

Tintina Announces Over One Billion Pounds of High Grade Measured & Indicated Copper Resources at its 100% Owned Black Butte Copper Project, Montana, USA

Page 2 of 5

Johnny Lee Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate

The Johnny Lee Deposit (Fig. 3) consists of two zones - an Upper Zone and a Lower Zone. The drill hole database that was used to estimate the Johnny Lee Deposit Mineral resource consists of 136 drill holes totaling 37,530.3 metres (123,130 feet), all containing one or more intercepts of significant mineralization. Of these, 106 drill holes, representing 23,704.5 metres (77,770 feet) of drilling, were used to estimate the Johnny Lee Deposit Upper Zone resource. In addition, 47 of the 136 holes were used to estimate the Johnny Lee Deposit Lower Zone resource. Further, 17 of the 136 holes were used to estimate both Upper Zone and Lower Zone resources. Mineralization occurs as lenses of high grade copper, primarily chalcopyrite which is hosted within thicker and more extensive massive pyritic sulfide lenses, all of which are contained in un-mineralized shale and carbonate country rock. Zone boundaries are either faults and/or diminishing copper grades. Mike Lechner, president of Resource Modeling Inc., provided the new resource estimate as reported in a news release dated November 1, 2012.

Black Butte Copper Mineral Resource Estimate as of March 12, 2013Table 1 - Undiluted Measured and Indicated ("M&I") Resources at Black Butte Copper Project, MT, USA----------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED MEASURED RESOURCES - Johnny Lee Deposit----------------------------------------------------------------------------                      Estimated Metal Grades    Estimated Contained Metal                     -------------------------------------------------------            Cu                                       Cu         Co        Ag        Cutoff Tonnes   Cu    Co    Au    Ag        Lbs        Lbs  Au   Ozs           (%)  (000)  (%)   (%) (g/t) (g/t) (Millions) (Millions) Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Upper Zone     1.60  2,659 2.99 0.118 0.007  16.3        175        6.9 598 1,393--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED INDICATED RESOURCES - Johnny Lee and Lowry Deposits----------------------------------------------------------------------------                           Estimated Metal Grades  Estimated Contained Metal                           -------------------------------------------------                                                      Cu     Co                  Cu                                 Lbs    Lbs           Ag              Cutoff Tonnes   Cu   Co    Au    Ag (Mill- (Mill-     Au   Ozs                 (%)  (000)  (%)  (%) (g/t) (g/t)  ions)  ions)    Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Johnny Lee- Upper Zone     1.60  6,520 2.770.125 0.009  15.5    398   18.0  1,887 3,249----------------------------------------------------------------------------Johnny Lee - Lower Zone     1.50  2,387 6.400.033 0.304   4.5    337    1.7 23,330   345----------------------------------------------------------------------------Lowry - Middle Zone            1.6  4,099 2.94 0.10 0.006  15.1    266    9.0    800 1,990----------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL                13,006 3.49 0.10 0.062  13.4  1,001   28.7 26,017 5,584--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES - Johnny Lee and Lowry Deposits----------------------------------------------------------------------------                           Estimated Metal Grades  Estimated Contained Metal                           -------------------------------------------------                                                      Cu     Co                                                     Lbs    Lbs           Ag                    Tonnes   Cu    Co    Au    Ag (Mill- (Mill-     Au   Ozs                     (000)  (%)   (%) (g/t) (g/t)  ions)  ions)    Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Johnny Lee Upper and Lower Zones    11,566 3.57 0.100 0.069  13.4    910   26.6 25,815 4,987----------------------------------------------------------------------------Lowry Middle         4,099 2.94 0.100 0.006  15.1    266    9.0    800 1,990----------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL               15,655 3.40  0.10 0.053  13.9  1,176   35.6 26,615 6,977----------------------------------------------------------------------------Table 2 - Undiluted Inferred Resources at Black Butte Copper Project, MT, USA----------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED INFERRED RESOURCES - Johnny Lee Deposit----------------------------------------------------------------------------                    Estimated Metal Grades     Estimated Contained Metal                    --------------------------------------------------------           Cu                                      Cu         Co          Ag       Cutoff Tonnes   Cu   Co    Au    Ag        Lbs        Lbs    Au   Ozs          (%)  (000)  (%)  (%) (g/t) (g/t) (Millions) (Millions)   Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Upper Zone    1.60  1,255 2.520.102 0.008  15.2         70        2.8   323   613----------------------------------------------------------------------------Lower Zone    1.50    205 5.330.025 0.207   4.1         24        0.1 1,364    27----------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL          1,460 2.910.092 0.036  13.6         94        2.9 1,687   640--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED INFERRED RESOURCES - Lowry Deposit----------------------------------------------------------------------------                      Estimated Metal Grades    Estimated Contained Metal                      ------------------------------------------------------             Cu                                      Cu         Co        Ag         Cutoff Tonnes   Cu   Co    Au    Ag        Lbs        Lbs  Au   Ozs            (%)  (000)  (%)  (%) (g/t) (g/t) (Millions) (Millions) Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Middle Zone      1.60    801 2.58 0.10 0.008  14.1         46          2 200   363----------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL              801 2.58 0.10 0.008  14.1         46          2 200   363--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------UNDILUTED INFERRED RESOURCES - Johnny Lee and Lowry Deposits----------------------------------------------------------------------------                   Estimated Metal Grades      Estimated Contained Metal                  ----------------------------------------------------------                                                                          Ag            Tonnes    Cu    Co    Au    Ag     Cu Lbs     Co Lbs    Au   Ozs             (000)   (%)   (%) (g/t) (g/t) (Millions) (Millions)   Ozs (000)----------------------------------------------------------------------------Johnny Lee   1,460  2.91 0.092 0.036  13.6         94        2.9 1,687   640----------------------------------------------------------------------------Lowry          801  2.58  0.10 0.008  14.1         46        2.0   200   363----------------------------------------------------------------------------GRAND TOTAL  2,261  2.80  0.09 0.026  13.8        140        4.9 1.887 1,003----------------------------------------------------------------------------Notes:1. Mineral resources have been classified according to the "CIM Standards onMineral Resources and Reserves: Definitions and Guidelines" (November 2010).The PEA contained herein is preliminary in nature and includes inferredMineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to havethe economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to becategorized as Mineral reserves and there is no certainty that the PEA willbe realized.2. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred resource will beupgraded to an Indicated resource, or that an Indicated Mineral resourcewill be upgraded to a Measured resource, as a result of continuedexploration. Mineral resources are not Mineral reserves and do not havedemonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any partof the Mineral resources will be converted into Mineral reserves. Mineralresources are global in situ totals.3. For the Johnny Lee Deposit Upper Zone, cutoff grade calculation is basedon assumed metal prices of US$2.75/lb for copper and an 81% recovery. Amining cost of US$59.00/tonne, processing costs of US$16.00/Tonne, and G&Acosts of US$5.00/tonne were assumed to form the basis for the resource cut-off determination. For the Johnny Lee Deposit Lower Zone, cutoff gradecalculation is based on an assumed metal price of US$2.75/lb. for copper andan 84% Cu recovery. A mining cost of US$50/tonne, processing costs ofUS$16/tonne, G&A costs of US$5.00/tonne, and refining costs ofUS$5.53/tonne, were assumed to form the basis for the resource cut-offdetermination. For the Lowry Deposit Middle Zone,, the 1.6% Cu cutoff gradecalculation is based on an assumed metal price of US$2.75/lb. for copper andan 81% Cu recovery. A mining cost of US$57/tonne, processing costs of US$16/tonne, and G&A costs of US$5.00/tonne were assumed to form the basis forthe resource cut-off determination. Note: these costs differ from those usedfor the cash flow model in the PEA.4. Mineral resource tonnage and contained metal quantities have been roundedto reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and thus the numbers may not sumdue to rounding.

Continued | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next >>

Story Tools