News Column

Niko Reports Results for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2012

Page 23 of 41

Net income in the quarters was affected by:

--  Over the quarters, oil and natural gas revenue from the D6 Block has    declined due to reservoir performance.--  In the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded an additional    $6 million of profit petroleum expense for the Hazira Field, reducing    oil and natural gas revenue. The adjustment to profit petroleum expense    was the result of a court ruling finding that the 36-inch natural gas    sales pipeline that Niko and GSPC constructed to connect the Hazira    Field to the local industrial area was not eligible for cost recovery.--  In the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and again in the quarter ended March    31, 2012, depletion expense increased as a result of revisions to the    reserves and estimated future costs to develop the reserves.--  In each quarter, the Company expenses a portion of its exploration and    evaluation costs and the level of activity has varied over the periods.--  In the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Company impaired assets of $133    million and long term receivables of $23 million, in the quarter ended    June 30, 2012, the Company impaired assets of $39 million, and in the    quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company impaired assets of $29    million.--  In each quarter, gains and losses are recognized based on fluctuations    in the market prices of the Company's short-term investments that are    valued at fair value.--  In the quarter ended December 31, 2011, there was a $14 million expense    upon cancellation of stock options to recognize the remainder of the    expense associated with the options.--  In the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there was a $9.7 million fine    recorded related to the Company's guilty plea to one count of bribery    under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act relating to two    specific instances that occurred in 2005.--  In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there was a change in accounting    estimate related to deferred income tax expense. There was a revision in    the method of estimating the amount of taxable temporary differences    reversing during the tax holiday period.--  In the quarter ended March 31, 2012, there was a deferred income tax    recovery related to the revision of the reserve estimate, which    increased the value of the tax holiday for the D6 Block. There were    deferred income tax recoveries related to spending in Indonesia and    Trinidad applied against the deferred income tax liabilities recorded    upon the acquisitions of Voyager Energy Ltd. and Black Gold Energy LLC.--  In the quarter ended September 30, 2012, there was a deferred tax    recovery of $22 million, due to a reduction in exploration and    evaluation assets related to proceeds from a farm out and from a former    partner in exchange for assuming the partner's obligation for future    drilling commitments.--  In the quarter ended December 31, 2012, there was a deferred tax    recovery of $7 million due to the issuance of the convertible notes.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Company makes assumptions in applying certain critical accounting estimates that are uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made and may have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

The critical accounting estimates include oil and natural gas reserves, depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, asset impairment, decommissioning obligations, the amount and likelihood of contingent liabilities and income taxes. The critical accounting estimates are based on variable inputs including:

--  estimation of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and future cash    flows from the reserves;--  geological interpretations, exploration activities and success or    failure, and the Company's plans with respect to the property and    financial ability to hold the property;--  risk-free interest rates;--  estimation of future abandonment costs;--  facts and circumstances supporting the likelihood and amount of    contingent liabilities; and--  interpretation of income tax laws.

Continued | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | Next >>

Story Tools