though, the two sectors that provide the most generous dividend
payments -- utilities and telecommunications stocks -- have been
among the worst performers (though part of the damage was done by
the storm known as Sandy on the East Coast). Utility companies in
the S.&P. 500 have fallen 9.4 percent from their highs in October.
Telecommunication stocks in the index have dropped 11.3 percent from
theirs, compared with the broader index's 6.8 percent decline from
its recent high.
John Moorin, the founder of a medical equipment company near
Indianapolis, said he had sold about $650,000 in dividend-paying
stocks like McDonald's and Coca-Cola a few days after the election,
worried about the potential increase in taxes.
"I love these companies, but I'm so scared that now all of the
sudden I'm going to get taxed at such a rate with them that they
won't be worth anything," Mr. Moorin said.
Mr. Wynn has declared special dividends at the end of the year
before -- most recently in 2011 -- but in a call with analysts last
month, he hinted that higher taxes would cause him and other chief
executives to rethink big payouts in future years.
In the meantime, he added, it was "very difficult to do long-
range planning with a government that moves as much as this does on
so many issues."
Leggett & Platt, a diversified manufacturer based in Carthage,
Missouri, decided to move up payment of its fourth-quarter dividend
to December from January so shareholders could take advantage of the
lower rate.
"If we can help our shareholders avoid taxes and keep more of
their dividends, we'll do it," said David M. DeSonier, senior vice
president for corporate strategy and investor relations.
While negotiators are trying to find ways to raise more revenue
for the long term, some experts expect a substantial bump in tax
collections in the short term as investors take a multitude of steps
now that they would have taken in future years. After the top tax
rate on capital gains rose to 28 percent from 20 percent at the end
of 1986, the U.S. government's receipts from such gains doubled to
$52.9 billion in 1987, as sales surged at the end of the previous
tax year.
The potential jump in tax rates has been telegraphed for months,
but many investors say they did not respond sooner because they were
waiting to see whether Mitt Romney would defeat the president and
move forward with his commitment to keeping rates at current levels.
Mr. Obama, since defeating Mr. Romney, has continued his call for an
increase in marginal tax rates on the wealthy. A growing number of
Republican leaders have conceded that some increase is likely.
Kristina Collins, a chiropractor in McLean, Virginia, said she
and her husband planned to monitor the business income from their
joint practice closely to avoid crossing the income threshold for
higher taxes outlined by Mr. Obama on earnings above $200,000 for
individuals and $250,000 for couples.
Dr. Collins said she felt torn by being near the cutoff line and
disappointed that U.S. tax policy was providing a disincentive to
keep expanding a business she founded in 1998.
"If we're really close and it's near the end-year, maybe we'll
just close down for a while and go on vacation," she said.
Of the potential changes in the tax code set to take place Jan.
1, the scheduled increase in the tax rate on capital gains would hit
a particularly broad range of investments.
Business owners, for instance, can lock in the current top rate
of 15 percent on capital gains if they sell their company before the
end of the year. The capital gains tax also applies to increases in
the value of stocks and other securities, encouraging some investors
to sell holdings that have done well. That is one of several factors
cited in the recent plunge in the price of Apple shares. They have
dropped 26 percent since mid-September after rising 73 percent
earlier in the year.
The coming changes have not hurt all assets. Municipal bonds have
become more attractive because they are exempt from most U.S. taxes,
including the new surcharge related to Mr. Obama's health care law.
Frank Fantozzi, a financial planner in Cleveland, is recommending
that his wealthy clients increase their allocations to municipal
bonds from about 30 percent to about 40 percent.
But the potential effect of the scheduled tax increases and
government spending cuts has been mostly negative. Many market
strategists have suggested trimming overall holdings of risky assets
like stocks, and business executives are proceeding very cautiously.
Some business owners say they are holding off on hiring plans
because they expect tax rates to rise. Dyke Messinger, chief
executive of Power Curbers in Salisbury, North Carolina, said he
would like to fill four slots at his company, which makes
construction equipment, but would hire only three people because he
anticipated that his tax bill would rise by $100,000.
"It's not a huge amount of money," Mr. Messinger said. "But it's
enough money that you don't want to make a misstep."
Most Popular Stories
- SEO Traffic Lab Celebrate Wins at Digital Marketing Event 'Internet World 2013' in London
- Social Media Initiatives Should Follow Customers' Lead
- Apple CEO: Offshore Units Not a 'Tax Gimmick'
- U.S. Senate Accuses Apple of Large-scale Tax Avoidance
- UTEP Water Recycling Project Wins Venture Titles
- Marketo Makes a Mint in IPO: Stock Shoots Up More than 50 Percent
- Bieber Booed at Billboard Awards
- Crude Oil Up, Gasoline Down
- Austin Startup Compare Metrics Raises $3.5 Million for Expansion
- Why So Many Top 'Car Guys' Are Actually Women
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
Possible Tax Increases Sets Off Scramble to Avoid Them
Page 2 of 2
Source: (C) 2012 International Herald Tribune. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved
1 | 2 | Next >>
Story Tools



