News Column
Story Tools

Del.icio! del.icio.us

Digg It! Digg It!

E-Mail! E-Mail to a Friend

Print! Printable Version

Discuss!

Discuss on Forum

Comment! Comments

Tom Tancredo, Immigration Hard-liner, Shut Down By Protesters, Brief Violence

April 15, 2009

Rob Kuznia--HispanicBusiness.com


A speech by immigration hawk and former Republican Presidential candidate Tom Tancredo ended abruptly Tuesday night at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, after the event degenerated into a brief verbal confrontation between student activists and Tancredo himself, and culminated with a protester shattering a window.

Police came in and reportedly used pepper spray to clear the room, but no injuries were reported.

During the 2008 presidential election, Tancredo, then a Colorado congressman, was a one-issue candidate. His campaign slogan was "Secure the borders. Deport those who don't belong. Make sure they never come back."

In 2005, Tancredo authored a bill that included tighter border controls and employer penalties but no path to citizenship. He also has stirred controversy with respect to Muslims, saying in 2007 that a good way to deter a nuclear attack by terrorists is to threaten to retaliate by bombing Islamic holy sites such as Mecca and Medina.

Tancredo was invited to speak by a group on campus that opposes mass immigration and multiculturalism, according to the Associated Press.

On Tuesday night, he intended to talk about his opposition to in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. His speech in front of about 150 people was just getting underway when two protesters unfurled a banner in front of him reading "No one is illegal."

An awkward confrontation ensued, with Tancredo gripping the banner in both hands in attempt to tear it away.

"No, that's not fair," he said.

As Tancredo and the group of protesters began arguing, someone broke a window and Tancredo fled the room. In his absence people began shouting and milling about, prompting several police officers to clear the room.

Tuesday's meltdown prompted a statement of regret from Chancellor Holden Thorp.

''We pride ourselves on being a place where all points of view can be expressed and heard, so I'm disappointed that didn't happen tonight,'' Thorp said, according to AP




Source: HispanicBusiness.com (c) 2009. All rights reserved.


Comments

Total Comments: 5 | Pending Comments: 0

allsorts insurance
4/16/2009 6:46:28 PM PST
Both points of view were expressed! During the 60's people took it to the streets to protest injustices that continued to exist inspite of the so-called Slave Amendments (Civil Rights) passed as national law a hundred years prior to the protests. Shutting down the borders means affecting "a people" that has an established culture from Texas to California and their borders with Mexico. That culture is not Bostonian, or Mid-America, nor The South. And while the "accents" vary in these areas, much is said of how the "Mexican language-accent" clashes with them. Somehow this difference is "unpalatable" to the so-called American scene. The only way to keep America free of Mexicans or other Hispanics of different shades of color, is to rename the country. It should be any name but America.


bob tanabe
4/16/2009 5:37:38 PM PST
Typical scenario in our universities today. Bunch of communists gather, create some violence and disrupt someone who doesn't toe the Marxist line. The commies get the kid gloves treatment from the authorities who are afraid and/or are sympathetic with them.


ap17
4/16/2009 1:39:32 PM PST
what a racist ??what is he trying to prove?let ask his parents what do they think about this issue and how they were treated when they came to USA.


Estoban
4/16/2009 8:20:44 AM PST
The circle is complete! In the 60s, students fought vehemently for freedom of speech. Now students shut down freedom of speech. What a shame!


beau
4/16/2009 4:34:02 AM PST
freedom of speach and opinion are legal in various ways,like banners which are property of the designer-speaking in written form.the banner is clearly destroyed in this video and by whom.there are many ugly comments about the broken window which is still in question of who did that leaving viewers feeling it could have been anyone within the range of strike to the window.the only person visably upset seems to be the speaker.he knew beforehand everyone has an opinion and all are intitled-not just oneself .the video shows the banner being moved to be clearly read by view of the video camera in response to a distasteful comment directed to a(named by speaker)group of people.it appears the banner was moved in selfdefense of ethnic group characterization without harmful intent.




Story Tools

Del.icio! del.icio.us

Digg It! Digg It!

E-Mail! E-Mail to a Friend

Print! Printable Version

Discuss!

Discuss on Forum

Comment! Comments