US corporations are giving more consideration to international mergers & acquisitions involving a change of domicile as a means to tap cash held overseas in a more tax efficient manner, as well as to better compete in the global marketplace.
There has been a spate of US multinational corporations seeking favorable tax treatment of foreign earnings in jurisdictions that can significantly differ from US rules. Recent examples include US AbbVie acquiring
US GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) rules exempt corporates from recognizing deferred tax liabilities on foreign earnings that are reinvested abroad for an indefinite period. However, US companies cannot repatriate those earnings without paying corporation tax on the differential between the foreign tax and the likely higher US corporation tax. Unsurprisingly, US corporations have been disinclined to repatriate cash. Undistributed Foreign Earnings (UFE) consequently rise, (as do foreign cash piles), if not used for foreign capex or acquisitions.
To compensate, management may increase borrowings in its domestic US business if that business does not have sufficient stand-alone cash flow or earnings to support shareholder returns that are based on the group's consolidated numbers, domestic capex and the servicing of largely US-incurred debt.
When rating a US multinational corporate issuer or one that has redomiciled, Fitch evaluates the potential credit profile imbalances between the entity's domestic and foreign activities. A highly leveraged domestic business, despite healthy consolidated metrics, could lead Fitch to take a rating action.
We would likely be neutral as to the potential benefit of re-domiciling and would assess each M&A transaction on a case-by-case basis. For example, issuers might choose to return the "released" cash to shareholders instead of creditors. Moreover, loans, other cash remittances and guarantees from foreign entities may still be necessary to support debt remaining in the US business, which may lead to tax or other support complexities lying within the consolidated accounts.
In some cases, however, such a restructuring may, for example, offer greater potential for tax deductible intercompany interest payments in US entities. This type of restructuring might result in the group becoming more tax efficient overall, which could then permit taking the consolidated profile more at face value, if the potential for unprovided deferred tax has been reduced and cash is free-flowing within the group.
For more information on this topic, please see our report titled, "Phantom Earnings: Offshore Accounts of US Multinationals May Come Back to
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article, which may include hyperlinks to companies and current ratings, can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.
Phantom Earnings: Offshore Accounts of US Multinationals May Come Back to
+44 20 3530 1673
+44 20 3530 1236
Source: Fitch Ratings
Most Popular Stories
- Businesses, Investors Pressing for Green Policy
- Who's Next? More Nude Celeb Pics Hacked, Leaked
- Tips for Hiding, Securing Data on Smartphones
- ISIS Calls for Jihad Against 'Filthy French'
- Cristela Gets a Big Thumbs Up
- Hispanic Enterprises Drive U.S. Economy
- Iran Says Syria Strikes Illegal
- Would You Trade Privacy for Job Security?
- Lower Used-Car Prices Roil the Auto Industry
- E-scrap Recyclers Find Profits in Upgrades