THE administration's first attempts on Monday to get the opposition on board with a controversial foreclosures bill did not go so well, with both the socialist EDEK and the Greens reiterating they will oppose the legislation if it goes to the plenum in its present form.
Following a meeting with the ministers of finance and of interior,
"The consequences from passing the bill will be graver than a possible non-disbursement of the next tranche," Nicolaides said.
Thousands of homeowners and proprietors of business premises risk losing their properties en masse, further feeding the recession and "brutally impacting" the most vulnerable groups, he added.
However the item exempts so-called primary residences, which will be covered by a subsequent insolvency law.
EDEK feels the government did not push hard enough during its negotiations with the troika of lenders. The government insists it can extract no more, and has warned that its international creditors will recommend not releasing the next instalment (some €400m) when euro-area finance ministers discuss
The socialists are proposing a number of amendments to the bill if they are to get behind it. They want tangible assurances that mass foreclosures of mortgaged properties will be avoided; safeguards against a sudden plunge in real estate prices once auctions get underway; and, additional legally sanctioned measures shielding vulnerable groups, to be passed before the foreclosures bill comes up for a vote.
EDEK is also asking the government and the
This data, said EDEK, would make it possible to distinguish between viable and non-viable borrowers, in contrast to the government's proposed legislation which "indiscriminately" lumps all debtors in the same basket.
For their part, the Greens called for an overhaul of the foreclosures bill and that it be put to a vote on the same day as a law governing insolvencies, instead of the latter going to the plenum separately five months down the road.
That would call the troika's bluff, asserted party leader
The main change under the bill is the introduction of private auctions, instead of them being carried out by the land registry, which would save considerable time.
There will be two valuations – one by the borrower and one by the lender. If they disagree, there will be a third independent final valuation.
The land registry's valuations are typically on the higher end.
Lillikas said the bill adopts double standards, since for taxation purposes the land registry's estimate is considered, whereas for property auctions it will be the private valuations that count.
To keep things on an even keel, he said, the private valuations should also be taken into account when calculating property tax – lessening the tax burden on property owners. This would be one of the amendments to be tabled by his party.
Ruling DISY, meanwhile, has suggested that the revised land registry valuations, in 2013 prices, be used instead of the private estimates – the rationale being that property prices in early 2013 were around 10 per cent higher than today, thus allowing for higher auction starting prices.
The bill needs a simple majority in the House. An endorsement from all of DISY's and DIKO's MPs, plus the one vote from the
DIKO's stance is key. But party leader
The same sources denied media reports that DISY and DIKO are working on a joint amendment to the foreclosures bill, but did not entirely rule out the possibility in the days to come.
on Wednesday, the two ministers are scheduled to meet with DIKO, and on Thursday with the
Send to Kindle
Most Popular Stories
- More Hispanic Voters May Not Mean More Clout
- Government: 500 Million Records Stolen in 12 Months
- Pistorius Gets 5-year Sentence in Shooting Death
- Volatility No Reason to Bail on Stock Market
- Apple Pay Debuts With Few Issues
- Disney's Animated Feature 'Moana' Slated for 2016 Release
- 2016 Camaro Shrinks, Moves to Caddy Platform
- Mom Makes Toys R Us Pull 'Breaking Bad' Dolls
- Samsung Phones Cleared For U.S. Government Use
- Cuba Deploys More Medicos in Ebola Fight