Government should consult relevant stakeholders when formulating maize prices to avoid boycotts which are retrogressive to the economy, an economist has said.
The remarks come ahead of a ruling on a Constitutional Court application by the
Government gazetted the prices through the
GMAZ, along with the
The new Statutory Instrument (SI) stipulates that it was mandatory that grain in the country be procured at a floor price of
"We look at the value chain. The government should have brought all players to the table to agree on the minimum price.
"It could have been anything but we are having others complaining that it came from nowhere and they were not consulted. In future, if farmers and other players are consulted, they won't be any complaining," Kuipa said.
He said on the other hand the standoff between government and the GMAZ was good for farmers because it gave them better prices for their crop.
"This is good for farmers because the price that GMB announces is the floor price which means that all other prices are at that level or higher because there are no controls [on prices higher than the gazetted one].
"Out there farmers were being taken for granted where other buyers were buying at a low price," Kuipa said.
Kuipa said the development could however have a negative impact on consumers as they were likely to be affected by an increase in the price of mealie-meal and other maize products.
"This means that the prices of products such as milk, eggs, chicken and stock feeds may also go up, affecting consumers," said Kuipa.
Most Popular Stories
- More Hispanic Voters May Not Mean More Clout
- Apple Pay Debuts With Few Issues
- 2016 Camaro Shrinks, Moves to Caddy Platform
- Government: 500 Million Records Stolen in 12 Months
- Mom Makes Toys R Us Pull 'Breaking Bad' Dolls
- Pistorius Gets 5-year Sentence in Shooting Death
- Cuba Deploys More Medicos in Ebola Fight
- Eric Garcia Appointed as Revenue Chief
- New Effort to Ban Child Labor From Tobacco Farms
- Volatility No Reason to Bail on Stock Market