New standards are needed to shape the next generation of Internet services, says Dr
How do you create standards for technology which is developing at breakneck pace? That's the challenge facing
Existing Open Group working groups, such as the cloud working group, the QLM (quantum lifecycle management) group and the UDEF (universal data element framework) group have become part of the new Open Platform 3.0 initiative. And other working groups, notably the security working group, are also playing an instrumental role, Harding says.
All this could seem premature. These are new technologies, and rapidly developing. Are standards really needed?
"There's a crystallisation process," he says. "As technology advances, you see standards crystallise out." De facto standards emerge as technologies mature, Harding says, but the process needs to be monitored to help enterprises avoid lock-in and dead ends.
Cloud computing, one component of the Platform 3.0 concept, is a good example of this in practice: "There are well-established cloud solutions, but they aren't necessarily talking to each other. And point solutions apply in other areas as they develop. There are always tensions between vendors who produce proprietary solutions."
The standards process is a long road, but the
That is still some way from a full standard, Harding says. "That will follow about a year later."
Far from a static document, obsolete before it is published, Harding says the Open Platform 3.0 framework will be updated frequently as technology evolves, and will support fast-moving technologies.
A key focus is on describing business scenarios ? enterprise use cases which help users establish their alignment with standards. "For example, there is the desire within enterprises to have more direct use of technology by business departments, and to support the more rapid development cycle of new products. One objective is to have a standard that supports this. There are different ways it can be done; one way is by DevOps with a focus on a more rapid turnaround. Another is to provide users with some kind of development studio to compose solutions.
"We want the standard to support that sort of rapid development. In the public cloud, you can spend small amounts of money to get a prototype working, and then think about rollout and production – that's the point at which you should be thinking about long-term interoperability and questions like ownership and data recovery."
In every aspect of the Open Platform 3.0, security is a concern, along with related topics of identity and privacy. Says Harding: "Security is a key concern, and so is identity. You need a framework to identify who owns the data, who is trying to access it. There are a huge number of concerns, but some of them are already established. Governments are concerned about attacks on infrastructure; the same concerns apply to the Internet of things."
How the Internet of things develops will depend partly on standards, and Harding acknowledges everyone has work to do.
"It is getting easier for companies to work with standards bodies," Harding says. But dominant technologies tend to become de facto standards, and bad standards can be near impossible to displace. "It's incumbent on standards organisations to produce solid standards fast enough to avoid those bad standards happening in the first place."
Most Popular Stories
- U.S. Families 'Extraordinarily Vulnerable': Yellen
- Veterans to Get Training as Solar Panel Installers
- Apple Locks Itself Out of Devices
- Larry Ellison Steps Down as Oracle CEO
- Alibaba Prices IPO at $68 a Share
- Hispanics Doubt Marco Rubio's Chances
- Hillary Clinton to Address CHCI Conference
- Alibaba: Today China, Tomorrow the World
- Wildfires Rage in California
- John Cantlie Delivers ISIS Message to Save Life