News Column

J.D. Power Reports: Advisors Who Work with Investors to Set and Incorporate Goals into an Investment Strategy Are Key to Improving Satisfaction in Canada

August 21, 2014

Edward Jones Ranks Highest among Full Service Investment Firms in Canada for a Second Consecutive Year

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Satisfaction improves significantly when full service investment advisors collaborate with investors to set personal financial goals and then develop an investment strategy and performance review process around those goals, according to the J.D. Power 2014 Canadian Full Service Investor Satisfaction StudySM released today.

The study provides benchmarks of satisfaction that allow individual investment firms in Canada to compare their performance with other firms included in the study. Overall investor satisfaction with full service investment firms and financial institutions that offer wealth management and private banking services is measured in seven factors (in order of importance): investment advisor (39 per cent); investment performance (18 per cent); account information (17 per cent); account offerings (14 per cent); commissions and fees (8 per cent); website (3 per cent); and problem resolution (1 per cent).

Overall satisfaction improves to 755 (on a 1,000-point scale) from 737 in 2013. The study finds a strong correlation between investor satisfaction and actual market performance, with only 10 per cent of investors indicating their portfolio performance did not meet expectations in 2013, compared with 17 per cent in 2012. Satisfaction in the investment advisor factor is highest among investors who attribute the increase in their portfolio performance to their advisor’s decisions. Investment performance satisfaction has improved by a significant 31 points year over year to 703 in 2014, the highest level in the past four years (667 in 2011).

“While market conditions and investment performance remain strong, full service investment advisors need to differentiate themselves from the competition,” said Michael Foy, director of the wealth management practice at J.D. Power. “Providing goal-based advice is a great way to engage investors from the start and stay connected with them throughout their investment years. It begins with setting clearly defined goals, developing a strategy to achieve those goals that incorporates the investor’s risk tolerance, and then regularly tracking performance against the goals. Investment advisors who provide this level of service are not only more likely to have better relationships with investors, but their investors are also more likely to credit them rather than the market for positive investment performance and to be less critical when performance declines.”

KEY FINDINGS

  • Only one-third (33 per cent) of investors indicate that their advisor has met all three key criteria related to goals-based planning: helping set investment goals; incorporating risk tolerance into the plan; and providing insight into the progress toward achieving goals.
  • Investment advisor satisfaction is highest among Pre-Boomer1 investors at 870—which is 50 points above the industry average of 820—and lowest among Gen Y investors at 758. While age is often a proxy for wealth levels affluent investors in Gen X and Gen Y are also less satisfied than older investors, suggesting firms need to better understand and adapt to the needs and priorities of these younger investors.
  • Reaching Gen X and Gen Y investors through the communication channels they prefer and aligning messages with their needs may have a strong impact on future investment firm growth. Email is the preferred channel among Gen X (33 per cent) and Gen Y (32 per cent) investors, compared with Pre-Boomers (12 per cent) and Boomers (22 per cent). Younger investors’ financial goals tend to include funding such major purchases as a home or their childrens’ education.
  • Investors want transparency surrounding their fees and portfolio performance. Performance in this area continues to decline, with only 55 per cent of advisors delivering on this metric, compared with 57 per cent in 2013. When advisors explain the firm’s fee structure, satisfaction increases by 95 points to 798 from 703 when the fee structure isn’t explained. Only 32 per cent of investors indicate receiving a benchmark comparison on portfolio performance.
  • Firms that successfully help advisors develop investor-focused relationships build loyalty, recommendations and increased asset share over time. Among investors of an investor-focused firm, 66 per cent say they “definitely will not” switch to another investment firm; 25 per cent “intend to increase” the amount invested with the primary firm; 59 per cent say they “definitely will” recommend their primary investment firm; and 65 per cent “definitely will” recommend their investment advisor.

    Investment Firm Rankings

    Edward Jones ranks highest in investor satisfaction among full service investment firms in Canada, with a score of 791, an 18-point increase from 2013. Edward Jones performs particularly well in four factors: investment advisor; investment performance; account offerings; and commissions and fees. Following in the rankings are HollisWealth (formerly DundeeWealth) and TD Wealth Private Investment Advice (tied at 790 each).

    The 2014 Canadian Full Service Investor Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 4,623 investors who use advice-based investment services from financial institutions in Canada. The study was fielded in May and June 2014.





    Overall Customer Satisfaction Index Scores

    (Based on a 1,000-point scale)

     

    J.D. Power.com Power Circle RatingsTM

    For Consumers

                 

    Edward Jones

    HollisWealth (formerly DundeeWealth)

    TD Wealth Private Investment Advice

    Assante Wealth Management

    BMO Nesbitt Burns

    National Bank Financial

    Industry Average

    Investors Group Securities Inc.

    RBC Dominion Securities Inc.

    CIBC Wood Gundy

    Credential Securities

    ScotiaMcLeod

    Desjardins Securities

    Manulife Securities

    791

    790

    790

    774

    757

    757

    755

    754

    753

    747

    746

    741

    740

    737

    5

    5

    5

    4

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    1J.D. Power defines generational groups as Pre-Boomers (born before 1946); Baby Boomers (1946 to 1964);

    Gen X (1965 to 1976); and Gen Y (1977 to 1994)





    Power Circle Ratings Legend

    5 – Among the best

    4 – Better than most

    3 – About average

    2 – The rest



    About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info

    AboutMcGraw Hill Financial www.mhfi.com




    Media Relations Contacts

    Cohn & Wolfe

    Beth Daniher, 647-259-3279

    beth.daniher@cohnwolfe.ca

    or

    J.D. Power

    John Tews, 248-312-4119

    media.relations@jdpa.com


    Source: J.D. Power


  • For more stories on investments and markets, please see HispanicBusiness' Finance Channel



    Source: Business Wire


    Story Tools






    HispanicBusiness.com Facebook Linkedin Twitter RSS Feed Email Alerts & Newsletters