Straws in the wind time: the mighty
The almost equally mighty Mail Online - 169 million unique browsers around the globe - doesn't do subscriptions like the NYT. It relies on advertising: and that was nearly 50% up in the quarter that ended in June. Brilliant, superb? Or perhaps just a tad euphoric if you prefer actual money to percentages. Web ads brought in pounds 15m over the quarter, up pounds 5m on 2013. (Maybe they'll just miss a pounds 60m web target by the year's end.) But total revenue was pounds 183m - and print ads still accounted for pounds 46m, more than three times the digital take (while online staffing moved towards 500, no clear running costs provided). So profit, loss, development plans, ultimate success? You pays Lord Rothermere's money and you takes your uncertain choice.
Which thus locates unalloyed success in only one newsroom: at the Financial Times, where digital subs at over pounds 5 or pounds 7 a week on various packages are high enough for realistic reckoning alongside print circulation, so that rolling 455,000 online subscribers and 220,000 print buyers together produces a 13% rise year-on-year (with mobile growth accounting for nearly 50% of total traffic). The FT is in a special place and holds a special position. It shows signs of a real transition from print to digital. Of course one specialist model doesn't fit all. But it's still a neat model to watch - and admire.
Most Popular Stories
- Stocks Close Out Best Week in Nearly 2 Years
- Do Voters Want Compromise?
- Timeline for New York Ebola Doctor
- Ebola in New York, Mali Raises Travel Jitters
- Market Jolt Offers a Reality Check for Investors
- Steris to Add 100 Jobs in Birmingham
- 'Kissing Congressman' Admits Mistake in Reelection Bid
- Clinton Rallies New England Women
- Tech Workers Needed in South Florida
- Microsoft Earnings Drive Stocks Higher