There are many ways to look at BuzzFeed's progress, but one way would be to see this investment as, compared with the HuffPo sale, reflecting slow growth and a lack of enthusiasm about the business.
But let me back up.
In a sense, HuffPo and BuzzFeed represent a curious experiment in which you can see the course of the same company both having been sold and of having not been sold.
As it happens, there are not that many differences, except that HuffPo seems old hat and struggling for profits, and BuzzFeed seems, to some, like the bright future as it, too, struggles for profits.
The proposition of both companies is to maximize a digital publishing model within the clear limitations of digital publishing: that is, ad rates remain low and continue to drop, so eyeballs need to go up.
When it was sold,
Obviously, all Internet numbers should be taken with large doses of salt, but in both cases, you have very large audiences (BuzzFeed's exceeds the Super Bowl), costly to gather and maintain, with very low returns.
Still you have values that far exceed what media properties with similar revenues would be worth, but far less than what a technology company with similar growth metrics might be worth. Looking at the
BuzzFeed apparently attempted an exit of its own this past year, floating reports that Disney might buy it for a billion dollars. Failing that, it has now taken new money to prove that it has tech rather than media value.
It's a precarious predicament at a time when, judging by transactions of recent years, the market has become ever less keen on digital publishing.
BuzzFeed, with its new money, finds itself the standard bearer for Internet media.
Certainly, the stakes seem high, demanding special fortitude and a magical business plan. If it can't keep projecting the promise of a scalable tech company (higher and higher revenues against stable or declining costs), then it will only be seen as an advertising-driven business, one that advertisers remain skeptical about. That is, a struggling publisher -- which, in some sense, almost every ad-driven content site is.
Salmon is right: BuzzFeed has been as aggressive as any site in trying to turn this struggle for ad dollars from merely the old publishing model into something much more inventive and hopeful. It doesn't run advertising, per se, but rather a new hybrid form, teaching advertisers how to speak in its native, listicles language and, in Salmon's interpretation, making the company something more like an ad agency than a conventional publisher. In that, says Salmon, it is like Vice, a maker of videos that fall somewhere between journalism and advertising, that's also trying to upend investor prejudices against digital media. Vice reportedly has been valued at
BuzzFeedhas also earmarked its new investment money for more video development, joining the Internet-wide phenomenon of publishing sites trying to migrate into the television business.
It is offering, again Vice-like, a new idea about distributed content, so that you won't have to come to BuzzFeed; rather, BuzzFeed will be wherever you are, or some such.
It is even talking about upgrading its content, of becoming, at least intellectually, more valuable.
Most Popular Stories
- Rackspace Ends Talks About Possible Acquisition
- Mercedes Rolls Out S550 Plug-in Hybrid
- Missouri GM Plant Adding 750 jobs
- Poverty Rate Drops for First Time Since 2006
- Aaron Hernandez: I Felt Helpless to Refuse Police
- Cedeno Named USHCC Businessman of the Year
- Parameters Being Drawn for IS Action
- Anheuser-Busch, Visa Voice NFL Disapproval
- Can Kobach Keep Taylor's Name on Ballot?
- Two-thirds of Hispanics Doubt Media Accuracy