So the gallery lifted the photography ban, except for new displays with copyright issues. Art lovers were dismayed. The flash is a worry, of course. "There's a whole load of watercolours in the Wallace Collection that are behind a curtain," said Garnham, "because even the ordinary gallery light will damage them in time."
But the more pressing anxiety is over the sorry state of human nature. Nobody's just going to take a picture of Van Gogh's Sunflowers, are they? They're going to take a selfie.
What's this going to do to art? What's it going to do to a generation? Even taking a picture of a painting changes the way you look at it - documenting rather than experiencing. But then once you stick your face in the foreground, the experience is different again, less like art and more like going to the seaside and putting your head above the body of a wrestler in a swimsuit.
Well, I have some good news for the purists: there was nobody taking selfies in the
People taking photos of art with their phones divide into two categories: thoughtful, discreet snappers of tiny portraits of princesses, and everyone else taking pictures of Van Gogh. It seemed fitting to me that Van Gogh would be the go-to guy for an iPhone photo; he's the painter (I like to think) who would find it the most depressing.
Garnham disagreed. "It would be all of them. Because artists want you to look at their work, not use it as some backdrop, or exist at one remove from it." But artists wouldn't necessarily object to using technology. "It would be slightly hypocritical, because so many of them used optical devices to generate their paintings. There's lots of evidence from the 17th century onwards, optical effects in Vermeer, Canaletto."
On this basis, I started with Vermeer. It's nothing he wouldn't have done to me, I thought, placing myself in front of A Young Woman Seated at a Virginal. The problem was we didn't look like we'd have got on in real life. So I took one of myself with Goya's Princess of Eboli. I was told off doing this, by a person who I think was speaking Hungarian.
You can't take a selfie without going for the original selfie, Rembrandt's Self-Portrait at 63. The problem is that Rembrandt comes out better from the lighting, so I ended up looking older than 63. Also, this is one of the most venerated paintings in the gallery. The disapproval in the room flooded towards me. I thought I heard someone hiss. It was like that bit at the end of Dangerous Liaisons when Madame
In short, there is nothing to fear, for either the art crowd or the custodians of the human spirit.
Leader comment, page 36 =
Getting in on the picture and risking opprobrium from visitors to the
top) Rembrandt's Self-Portrait at 63, Philosophy by
Most Popular Stories
- HCL America Adding 1,200 IT Jobs
- Medical Mfg. Jobs Coming to Dayton
- Longtime Unemployed to Get Help in Las Vegas
- Michael Jackson, Freddie Mercury on Previously Unreleased Queen Cut
- Doctor Who Christmas Episode Begins Production
- SpaceX Aims for Predawn Launch on Saturday
- Women Key to Democratic Party: Clinton
- U.S. Chamber Caught Up in Tax Inversion Question
- Feds Won't Say How Many Border Crossers Jailed
- Christie Didn't Order Bridge Shut Down, Feds Say