ENP Newswire - 30 July 2014
Release date- 29072014 - West Chester, OH - AK Steel (NYSE: AKS) today reported its financial results for the second quarter of 2014.
2nd Quarter 2014 Performance Summary
Shipments of 1,397,500 tons
Sales of $1.53 billion with an average selling price of $1,095 per ton
Net after-tax loss of $17.1 million, or $0.13 per diluted share
Adjusted net income of $2.9 million, or $0.02 per diluted share
Adjusted EBITDA of $64.5 million
Ended 2nd quarter with solid liquidity of $539 million
AK Steel reported a net loss of $17.1 million, or $0.13 per diluted share of common stock, for the second quarter of 2014, compared to a net loss of $40.4 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2013 and net loss of $86.1 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2014.
Excluding the unrealized mark-to-market loss on commodity derivatives discussed below, the company reported adjusted net income of $2.9 million, or $0.02 per diluted share. The company reported adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the 'Non-GAAP Financial Measures' section below) of $64.5 million, or $46 per ton, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to adjusted EBITDA of $47.5 million, or $36 per ton, for the year-ago second quarter and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $2.8 million, or $2 per ton, for the first quarter of 2014.
'We experienced meaningful improvements in virtually every aspect of our business in the second quarter as compared to the first quarter of 2014,' said James L. Wainscott, Chairman, President and CEO of AK Steel. 'Despite facing some significant challenges in the second quarter, on an adjusted basis, we earned net income and we are well-positioned for a much better third quarter and second-half of 2014.'
Net sales for the second quarter of 2014 were $1.53 billion on shipments of 1,397,500 tons, compared to net sales of $1.40 billion on shipments of 1,323,700 tons for the year-ago second quarter and net sales of $1.38 billion on shipments of 1,262,100 tons for the first quarter of 2014. The increase in shipments in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2014 was primarily a result of the recovery from the planned and unplanned outages at the Ashland Works blast furnace in the first quarter, partially offset by the effects of the extreme winter weather conditions which reduced the availability of iron ore pellets.
The company said its average selling price for the second quarter of 2014 was $1,095 per ton, essentially flat with the first quarter of 2014. Improved selling prices in the second quarter for many of the company's products were offset by a change in mix, as more shipments of lower value-added products were made to the carbon spot market. The company also said its average selling price for the second quarter of 2014 increased 3% from the second quarter of 2013, primarily as a result of higher spot market prices for carbon steel products.
Costs of products sold increased in the second quarter of 2014 due to the continued adverse effects of the extreme cold weather conditions the company experienced in the first quarter. Those conditions resulted in an extraordinarily high level of ice coverage on the Great Lakes, which delayed the start of the 2014 shipping season on the Great Lakes and slowed the movement of iron ore. As a result, the available supply of iron ore to the steel industry in the second quarter was less than had been anticipated, and the company was forced to reduce the production rate at its blast furnaces to match production levels to the available supply of iron ore. The company also experienced higher transportation costs for the iron ore pellets it received in the second quarter. The company incurred additional costs for these issues in the second quarter of 2014 of approximately $15.0 million, or $0.11 per diluted share.
The company incurred $2.5 million of costs for planned outages during the second quarter of 2014, compared to $21.6 million in the year-ago second quarter and $29.4 million in the first quarter of 2014.
The 2014 second quarter results included a LIFO credit of $3.3 million, compared to a LIFO credit of $12.4 million for the second quarter of 2013 and a LIFO credit of $1.5 million for the first quarter of 2014.
The company ended the second quarter of 2014 with total liquidity of $538.9 million consisting of cash and cash equivalents and $502.5 million of availability under the company's revolving credit facility. Consistent with prior seasonal patterns, working capital was a use of $149.0 million of cash in the second quarter of 2014, primarily as a result of an increase in accounts receivable from strong June sales and interest payments. The company anticipates that working capital will continue to be a use of cash in the third quarter and a significant source of cash in the fourth quarter of 2014.
For the first six months of 2014, the company reported a net loss of $103.2 million, or $0.76 per diluted share. For the corresponding six months of 2013, the company reported a net loss of $50.3 million, or $0.37 per diluted share. Sales for the first six months of 2014 were $2.91 billion compared to sales of $2.77 billion in the first half of 2013. Shipments for the first half of 2014 were 2,659,600 tons compared to 2,613,500 tons in the first half of 2013.
Extreme winter weather conditions in early 2014 resulted in extra costs of approximately $45.0 million for the first six months of 2014. Energy costs were higher in the first quarter of 2014, primarily for electricity and natural gas. The extreme winter weather conditions also affected the delivery of iron ore pellets in the second quarter of 2014 with the company incurring additional costs for transportation and operations. The first six months of 2014 also included $23.4 million in mark-to-market losses on derivatives (discussed below) and a $5.8 million charge relating to a tentative settlement of certain class action antitrust claims.
An incident at the company's Ashland (KY) Works blast furnace in February 2014 resulted in unplanned outage costs of approximately $18.0 million in the first six months of 2014. In June 2013, an incident at the company's Middletown (OH) Works blast furnace resulted in unplanned outage costs of approximately $6.2 million in the first six months of 2013.
The company recorded expenses of $31.9 million during the first six months of 2014 for planned outages, compared to expenses of $22.6 million during the first six months of 2013.
AK Steel uses various derivatives to hedge the price of certain commodities, primarily iron ore and energy. For some of these derivatives, the company is unable to or does not use hedge accounting treatment under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but instead records changes in the values of the derivatives in the statement of operations using mark-to-market accounting. As a result, unrealized gains and losses are recognized prior to the periods that the underlying exposures being hedged are recognized. The results for the first six months of 2014 include $23.4 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for unrealized mark-to-market losses on derivatives, primarily in costs of products sold, with $20.0 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, of that amount coming in the second quarter of the year. However, the company expects that either its cost for purchasing iron ore and other commodities associated with the hedging strategies will be reduced by a similar amount in future periods, or an offsetting unrealized gain will be recognized if the mark-to-market loss on the derivative reverses before settlement. Therefore, the company anticipates that the mark-to-market losses included in its results for the first six months of 2014 are primarily a matter of timing and will be substantially offset in the remainder of 2014.
Third Quarter 2014 Outlook
Consistent with its current practice, the company expects to provide detailed guidance for its third quarter results in September.
Safe Harbor Statement
The statements in this release with respect to future results reflect management's estimates and beliefs and are intended to be, and hereby are identified as 'forward-looking statements' for purposes of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as 'expects,' 'anticipates,' 'believes,' 'intends,' 'plans,' 'estimates' and other similar references to future periods typically identify such forward-looking statements.
The company cautions readers that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently expected by management, including that the acquisition of Severstal Dearborn may not be consummated, or may not be consummated in a timely manner; that regulatory approval not be obtained or may only be obtained subject to conditions that are not anticipated; that Severstal Dearborn will not be integrated successfully into AK Steel following the consummation of the acquisition; and that cost savings, synergies, accretion to earnings, increased shipments and other anticipated benefits and opportunities from the acquisition may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected. In addition, our results and financial condition and any benefits from the acquisition, if consummated, could be adversely affected by reduced selling prices, shipments and profits associated with a highly competitive industry with excess capacity; changes in the cost of raw materials and energy; the company's significant amount of debt and other obligations; severe financial hardship or bankruptcy of one or more of the company's major customers; reduced demand in key product markets due to competition from alternatives to steel or other factors; increased global steel production and imports; excess inventory of raw materials; supply chain disruptions or poor quality of raw materials; production disruption or reduced production levels; the company's healthcare and pension obligations; not timely reaching new labor agreements; major litigation, arbitrations, environmental issues and other contingencies; regulatory compliance and changes; climate change and greenhouse gas emission limitations; conditions in the financial, credit, capital and banking markets; the company's use of derivative contracts to hedge commodity pricing volatility; the value of the company's net deferred tax assets; inability to fully realize benefits of long-term cost savings and margin enhancement initiatives; lower quantities, quality or yield of estimated coal reserves of AK Coal; increased governmental regulation of mining activities; inability to hire or retain skilled labor and experienced manufacturing and mining managers; and IT security threats and sophisticated cybercrime; as well as those risks and uncertainties discussed in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as updated in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, the company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future developments or events.
AK Steel is a world leader in the production of flat-rolled carbon, stainless and electrical steel products, primarily for automotive, infrastructure and manufacturing, construction and electrical power generation and distribution markets. The company's AK Tube subsidiary produces carbon and stainless electric resistance welded tubular steel products for truck, automotive and other markets. Headquartered in West Chester, Ohio (Greater Cincinnati), the company employs approximately 6,500 men and women at seven steel plants and two tube manufacturing plants across four states: Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The company also has interests in iron ore through its Magnetation LLC joint venture and in metallurgical coal through its AK Coal subsidiary. Additional information about AK Steel is available at www.aksteel.com.