Study Results from NHS Foundation Trust Update Understanding of Quality and Safety Research (Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers' perspectives)
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Journal of Technology -- Research findings on Quality and Safety Research are discussed in a new report. According to news reporting out of Taunton, United Kingdom, by VerticalNews editors, research stated, "Risk management is a core part of healthcare practice, especially within maternity services, where litigation and societal costs are high. There has been little investigation into the experiences and opinions of those staff directly involved in risk management: lead obstetricians and specialist risk midwives, who are ideally placed to identify how current implementation of risk management strategies can be improved."
Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from NHS Foundation Trust, "A qualitative study of consultant-led maternity units in an English region. Semistructured interviews were conducted with the obstetric and midwifery risk management leads for each unit. We explored their approach to risk management, particularly their opinions regarding quality monitoring and related barriers/issues. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Twenty-seven staff from 12/15 maternity units participated. Key issues identified included: concern for the accuracy and validity of their local data, potential difficulties related to data collation, the negative impact of external interference by national regulatory bodies on local clinical priorities, the influence of the local culture of the maternity unit on levels of engagement in the risk management process, and scepticism about the value of benchmarking of maternity units without adjustment for population characteristics. Local maternity risk managers may provide valuable, clinically relevant insights into current issues in clinical data monitoring. Improvements should focus on the accuracy and ease of data collation with a need for an agreed maternity indicators set, populated from validated databases, and not reliant on data collection systems that distract clinicians from patient activity and quality improvement. It is clear that working relationships between risk managers, their own clinical teams and external national bodies require improvement and alignment. Further discussion regarding benchmarking between maternity units is required prior to implementation."
According to the news editors, the research concluded: "These findings are likely to be relevant to other clinical specialties."
For more information on this research see: Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers' perspectives. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2014;23(6):457-464. BMJ Quality & Safety can be contacted at: Bmj Publishing Group, British Med Assoc House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, England. (BMJ Publishing Group - group.bmj.com/; BMJ Quality & Safety - qualitysafety.bmj.com/)
Our news journalists report that additional information may be obtained by contacting R.A. Simms, Taunton & Somerset NHS Fdn Trust, Dept. of Womens Hlth, Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom. Additional authors for this research include A. Yelland, H. Ping, A.J. Beringer, T.J. Draycott and R. Fox.
Keywords for this news article include: Europe, Taunton, United Kingdom, Quality and Safety Research
Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world. Copyright 2014, NewsRx LLC