Our nation relies on the efficient flow of commerce across our border, and it is the job of
To accomplish this mission, sufficient port of entry infrastructure is needed along with robust Customs and Border Protection staffing.
CBP's important mission not only keeps America safe, but also ensures tens of thousands of American jobs and billions of dollars in commerce come to the country through trade with
A significant portion of the trade with
This is especially true with just-in-time manufacturing, critical to the auto industry in my home state of
As our economy and security requirements grow, our ports of entry must be able to accommodate more trucks, passengers and cargo, while at the same time allowing the people who cross the border each day convenient and secure travel.
How CBP and the Federal Government as whole prioritize the need to expand and update existing ports while also planning for new ports is neither clear nor transparent. It is, in fact, quite complicated.
While several land ports of entry projects were included in the President's budget request this Committee has not been provided significant information on CBP's strategic plan for port of entry modernization and construction for future projects.
This committee has asked for a list of CBP's port of entry priorities, but thus far CBP has been unwilling to share that list with this Committee.
This lack of transparency is troubling, to put it kindly. CBP cannot continue to be a big black hole when it comes to Ports of Entry infrastructure needs, which can significantly impact both trade facilitation and homeland security.
Many Members of this Committee, myself included, have ports of entry in their districts, many of which need improvement. We would like to know where on the list these projects fall, and more importantly, how CBP determines how these projects rank.
Surely, that is something CBP should and can defend to the membership of this Committee. We should not have to issue a subpoena to get routine information out of this agency.
In my own district, we have the
Homes and businesses in the proposed expansion site were condemned and demolished to allow for a plaza to meet the needs of CBP. The destruction was based a promise to build this needed plaza that hasn't been fulfilled.
A full 60 acres of tax base have been removed from the rolls putting great stress on a community that has been under further stress of the difficult economy. And our Canadian partners have expanded the customs plaza on their side of the bridge years ago with the understanding that the American side of the bridge would also have a plaza upgrade. And like the people of
We are shovel ready in
It seems to me that the
And some in our state would also like to add a new crossing in
I am certainly mindful of the tough budget times we are in. As a nation, we need to make tough choices when it comes to the limited dollars available for port of entry construction.
But the crossing of goods and services across the border helps to grow our economy and tax base - it's not frivolous spending; it's an investment in our future economic growth and prosperity which also would help to add money to the treasury and ease our budget problems.
That is why I fully support concepts like public-private-partnerships and other innovative ways to fund infrastructure improvements. I support section 560 and 559 language that was included in the most recent appropriation bill that allows for reimbursable agreements, and the ability of organizations to offer donations.
The goal of this hearing is to better understand CBP's criteria for prioritizing land ports of entry, determine how they decide to fund projects, and explore the role that public-private partnerships, and other unique approaches to financing, may play in moving the process along.
I look forward to hearing from our witnesses on how the GSA works collaboratively with CBP to identify priority projects, and ensure funding is provided in the
Ports of Entry across the nation are in dire need of modernization and expansion. I believe we need to tap into the expertise of the private sector, and partner with them to come up with better, more cost effective approaches to new port of entry construction.
Read this original document at: http://homeland.house.gov/sites/homeland.house.gov/files/documents/07-16-14-Miller-Open.pdf
Most Popular Stories
- McDonald's Packages Coffee for National Distribution
- Castro-Blanco Joins Fifth Street Finance Board
- Ballmer Steps Down From Microsoft Board
- HTC Makes Windows Version of Flagship One Phone
- Rising Freight Prices Signal Global Recovery
- Sprint Cancels Framily, Rolls Out New Data Pricing Plan
- Eric Holder Bringing Civil Rights Reminders to Ferguson
- Russia Claims Ukraine Leaders Are Satanists, Jews or Maybe Even Scientologists
- Bob Marley Musical to Make Premiere in Baltimore
- Uber Hires Obama Campaign Manager David Plouffe