Thus far in 2014, cat bond investors have been willing to accept higher levels of risk at lower risk premiums, which have still been viewed as attractive compared to other asset classes, given their diversification benefits relative to traditional investment market risks.
Ratios of risk premiums to expected loss have fallen dramatically in the catastrophe bond market over the past several years as investor demand has greatly exceeded the available supply. The decline has been evident in the series of Queen Street transactions, as the last four issuances have seen a continuous drop to 2.02x for Queen Street IX from 4.72x for Queen Street VI (issued in 2012). Although the perils were different, the underlying expected loss remained relatively constant at 2.7%, while the risk premium declined to 5.50% from 10.35%.
If Queen Street X had been placed at the lower end a price range between 4.75% and 5.50%, it would have been one of the first bonds for which the risk premium/expected loss ratio would have fallen below 2.0x.
Through first-half 2014, nearly two dozen catastrophe bonds with varying risk levels were issued globally with an average risk premium of approximately 4.3%. This compares to the same period of 2013, which experienced an average of 5.7%. Of the bonds issued in 2014, four individual tranches were issued at a risk premium to expected-loss multiple of less than 3.0x. They include Residential Reinsurance 2014, Ltd. (Class 10 Tranche: 15% risk premium),
The Residential Reinsurance 2014, Ltd. deal sponsored by
As the hurricane season runs from June to November, Fitch believes that the catastrophe bond market will see less U.S. named-storm peril issuance coming to market for the next couple of months. Other perils are expected to continue to be issued at relatively low risk premium/expected loss multiples throughout the year. As the market approaches a floor for cat bond pricing, the risk premiums paid to investors will be an important factor in determining the demand for cat bond transactions.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.
'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
+1 312 368-3263
+1 312 368-3182
Financial Intuitions/Fitch Wire
+1 212 908-0652
Source: Fitch Ratings
Most Popular Stories
- Americans Still Pessimistic Despite Economic Growth
- Apple to Unveil New Items on Sept. 9
- Friends Followed Similar Paths to Violent Jihad
- Axxis Solutions Appoints Benites as CEO
- California Moves Toward Ban on Plastic Bags
- Obama Puts Ukraine Violence on Russia
- Hillary Clinton Breaks Silence on Ferguson
- Janet Yellen's Assets Grew by 8 Percent in 2013
- Identity Thieves Prey on Job Seekers
- Parra Joins Exclusive Club of Hispanic CEOs