Fitch ratings above speak only to the auction preferred shares outstanding by each fund. Fitch has not reviewed or assigned ratings to the retail fixed-rate preferred shares outstanding by the funds (
GDV FUND SPIN-OFF
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The 'AA' long-term ratings primarily reflect:
--Sufficient asset coverage provided to the preferred shares as calculated per the funds' over-collateralization (OC) tests;
--The structural protections afforded by mandatory collateral maintenance and de-leveraging provisions in the event of asset coverage declines;
--The legal and regulatory parameters that govern the funds' operations;
--The capabilities of
The 'AA' ratings address credit risk only and do not speak to the liquidity of the preferred shares on the secondary market.
The funds are closed-end management investment companies regulated by the 1940 Act. As of
GAB's primary objective is long-term growth of capital with income as a secondary objective. GAB top equity investments were in broadcasting, media and cable companies and industrial/manufacturing companies. GGT's investment objective is long-term growth of capital, with income as a secondary objective. GGT's top equity investments were in broadcasting, media and cable companies, and computer and electronics companies. GUT's primary objective is long-term growth of capital and income. The fund's top equity investments were in utilities (power), energy (oil & gas); and computer and electronics companies. GDV's investment objective is to seek a high level of total return on its assets with an emphasis on dividends and income. The fund's top equity investments were in energy (oil & gas); food, beverage and tobacco; and industrial/manufacturing.
The funds' asset coverage ratio (pro forma for GDV incorporating the effect of the spin-off) as calculated in accordance with the Fitch total and net OC tests (Fitch OC tests) per the 'AA' rating guidelines outlined in Fitch's closed-end fund criteria, were in excess of 100%. These are the minimum asset coverage threshold required by the funds' governing documents.
The Fitch OC tests calculate standardized asset coverage by applying haircuts to portfolio holdings based on riskiness and diversification of the assets and measuring their ability to cover both on and off-balance sheet liabilities at the assigned 'AA' stress level.
The funds' asset coverage ratio, as calculated in accordance with the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) at current market value, were in excess of 200%. This is the minimum asset coverage threshold required by the funds' governing documents.
There was no material adverse impact on GDV asset coverage as a result of the spin-off.
Compliance with the Fitch OC and Asset Coverage tests is tested periodically. The fund manager is expected to cure any breach by altering the composition of the portfolio toward assets with lower discount factors (for Fitch OC breaches), or by reducing leverage in a sufficient amount (for all other breaches) within a pre-specified time period.
For Fitch OC and asset coverage tests, the maximum market value exposure (i.e. valuation, cure and redemption) that preferred shareholders would be exposed to before cure or redemption is approximately 30 and 113 calendar days, respectively.
The rating assigned to the preferred shares may be sensitive to material changes in the leverage composition, portfolio quality or market risk of the fund, as described above. A material adverse deviation from Fitch guidelines for any key rating driver could cause the rating to be lowered by Fitch.
For additional information about Fitch closed-end fund ratings guidelines, please review the criteria referenced below, which can be found on Fitch's website.
To receive forthcoming complimentary closed-end fund research from Fitch, opt-in at the following link: http://pages.fitchemail.fitchratings.com/FAMCEFBlankOptin/
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.
The sources of information used to assess this rating were the public domain and
--'Rating Closed-End Fund Debt and Preferred Stock' (
--'MLP Closed-End Funds: A Capital Structure Case Study' (
--'2014 Outlook: U.S. Closed-End Fund Leverage' (
--'Use of Leverage in U.S. Closed-End Funds (Slidedeck Apr-2014)' (
--'Fitch: US Closed-End Funds Pick Up Steam in Private Placements' (
Rating Closed-End Fund Debt and Preferred Stock
MLP Closed-End Funds: A Capital Structure Case Study
2014 Outlook: U.S. Closed-End Fund Leverage
Use of Leverage in U.S. Closed-End Funds (Slidedeck Apr-2014)
Source: Fitch Ratings
Most Popular Stories
- James Foley Beheading Video Is Real Thing: White House
- McDonald's Packages Coffee for National Distribution
- Apple Stock Bounces Back Big Time
- Faith Groups Divest From Fossil Fuels
- Notes From the July FOMC Meeting
- Castro-Blanco Joins Fifth Street Finance Board
- Honda's Safe Approach Pays Off in Sales
- Ballmer Steps Down From Microsoft Board
- GE Healthcare Bringing Jobs to Massachusetts
- Target Slashes Annual Profit Outlook