UNFAIR capital rules are stopping challenger banks competing with big lenders by forcing them to hold bigger buffers against the same loans, the
The biggest banks can hold less capital than smaller lenders against the same debts, because they have enough data to prove to regulators exactly how safe the loans are.
Smaller and newer banks cannot do this, leaving them holding as much as six times more capital for the same loans, pushing up costs.
"If the authorities really do want to stimulate competition then they should look to provide the challengers with something that does allow them to deviate from the standardised
Regulators have taken some steps which help limit the smaller banks' disadvantages. For instance, the leverage ratio puts a backstop under capital ratios, stopping a bank or building society's capital ratio falling too low even when it only deals in very low risk loans.
However, this only limits big banks' advantages, rather than aiding smaller lenders.
THE FORUM: Page 20 .
Most Popular Stories
- Fantasy Football Gambling Industry Facing Increased Legal Scrutiny
- Obama Promoting Economic Gains As Elections Near
- NATO Plans High-Readiness Force to Counter Russia
- As States Legalize Pot, Will Traffic Deaths Rise?
- 'Guardians of the Galaxy' Conquers the North American Box Office with $16.3M
- GE Capital and Petters-Related Fund in Legal Battle
- California Conservation Conundrum: Water Use Varies Greatly Across State
- Combating Online Abuse Not Easy for Gamers
- Even With Surly 2014 Electorate, It's 'Still an Incumbent's World'
- Feds Want Nuclear Waste Train, but Nowhere to Go