The Parliament of
The current debate underway signals that those who are opposed to the Bill do not understand the relevance of a law to regulate scientific applications. We all know that rapid advances in science can offer solutions to many of mankind's challenges but every technology, however useful it may be, can be misused intentionally or unintentionally and may result in undesirable consequences if not appropriately regulated by responsible technical bodies. The Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill is designed to do just that.
The science of genetic engineering is not new. Also known as genetic modification (GM), it has been widely used in the medical, industrial and environmental sectors worldwide. Though the public often hears about the controversy, the approach has been used for almost two decades without a single valid safety concern.
To date, 30 countries cultivate GM crops, and supply food and animal feed to all countries in the world, including
Without a law in place, we do not have legal recourse to check the work of our scientists or that of importers dealing with GM tools and products. There is international consensus that the science of GM must be regulated, as enshrined in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, a major international treaty governing the trans-boundary movement of modern biotechnology products, and to which
Most Popular Stories
- Obama Administration Releases Proposal to Regulate For-Profit Colleges
- Apple, HP, Intel May Take a Hit from Slowdown in Smartphone Sales Growth
- Elizabeth Vargas' Husband Marc Cohn Addresses Rumors
- Keurig Adds Peet's coffee, Alters Starbucks deal
- U.S. to Relinquish Gov't Control Over Internet
- Motley Crue's Nikki Sixx Marries Model Courtney Bingham
- Quiznos Files for Chapter 11
- Chinese e-Commerce Giant Alibaba Gears for IPO in U.S.
- FDIC Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Banks Allegedly Hurt by Libor Scandal
- Some California Cities Seeking Water Independence