The future of the Senate filibuster -- and of three Obama
administration appointees from Buffalo whose nominations have been stalled by
that age-old delaying tactic -- hung in the balance Thursday as Democrats moved
toward changing Senate rules to get those controversial nominations and four
others past the recalcitrant Republican minority.
Threatening to deploy what's long been called "the nuclear option," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Democrats would move next week to change Senate rules to curtail the use of the filibuster if Republicans did not let those nominations go forward.
Reid, who had long opposed changing the filibuster rules, said Democrats would have no choice but to move to restrict the use of the delaying tactic on nominations if Republicans continued to block confirmation votes.
"We want to break the gridlock and make Washington work," Reid said, arguing that the Obama administration appointees had encountered "unprecedented obstruction."
Republicans, meanwhile, were aghast that Democrats would even consider changing a Senate tradition that GOP and Democratic minorities alike have used to block nominees they don't like.
"This is about manufacturing a pretext for a power grab," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. He warned that if Democrats vote to change Senate rules to curtail the filibuster, "they will live to regret it."
At the center of the controversy is Thomas E. Perez, a Buffalo native nominated to serve as labor secretary. Also at stake is President Obama's nomination of Mark Gaston Pearce, a Buffalo lawyer, to continue as head of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the nomination of Buffalo-born lawyer Richard F. Griffin Jr. to serve on the NLRB.
Hoping to break the logjam, Reid filed motions to allow votes on those three nominees to move forward. Similarly, he filed motions aimed at getting the Senate moving on Obama's choices to head the Environmental Protection Agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Import-Export Bank, as well as a third NLRB appointee.
Because of the Senate's filibuster rules, all seven of those nominations would require 60 votes to move forward -- difficult to accomplish in a body with 52 Democrats, 46 Republicans and two independents who caucus with the Democrats.
But Reid indicated that if Republicans do not let the nominations proceed to a simple majority vote, he will move next week to change the Senate rules so that the filibuster could no longer be used on confirmation votes.
The filibuster -- and its 60-vote requirement to proceed to Senate business -- does not apply to votes on changes in Senate rules, meaning the Democrats can shrink the filibuster on a party-line vote.
Even many Democrats who had long been reluctant to do that, such as New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, appeared Thursday to be ready to act to counter what they see as Republican obstructionism.
"A new tactic has been introduced, to try to paralyze the executive branch the way they've paralyzed the legislative branches, because they don't want the government to function," Schumer said.
Democrats noted that between 1949 and 2009, there were 20 filibusters aimed at blocking executive-branch appointees -- but that there have been 16 such filibusters since Obama took office in 2009.
Most Popular Stories
- American Airlines, US Airways Complete Merger
- ACA Delay Stresses Small Businesses
- Unemployed Wait as Lawmakers Debate
- Questions Remain in Jenni Rivera's Death
- General Dynamics Plans 200 New Jobs in N.M.
- Dell Offers Undisclosed Number of Employee Buyouts
- Saab Gets Back into the Game; U.S. Auto Sales Soar
- Harley Issues Motorcycle Recall
- Auto Dealer Builds Big Solar Project
- Authorities Close to Deal with JPMorgan Chase over Madoff Response