Smithfield Foods' top executive is set to testify
Wednesday before two senators who are deeply skeptical of a blockbuster deal to
sell America's largest pork processor to a deep-pocketed Chinese concern.
Smithfield chief executive C. Larry Pope has been an unflappable cheerleader for the company's proposed sale to Shuanghui International, which still must clear regulatory hurdles.
The acquisition, he's noted, would translate to a 31 percent premium for Smithfield shareholders, and it also has come with assurances from Shuanghui executives that U.S operations will be left unchanged and employees kept on. Pope has also stressed repeatedly that it would lead to the export of American pork to China and not the reverse.
But, state and federal politicians have voiced concerns that the deal's approval would harm the country's pork supply, and the hearing will give members of the Senate Agriculture Committee the first crack at publicly grilling Pope.
The committee's chairwoman, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., is already one of the most vocal critics of the deal in Congress.
"The agencies responsible for approving this possible merger must take China's and Shuanghui's troubling track record on food safety into account, and do everything in their power to ensure our national security and the health of our families is not jeopardized," she said in a June statement.
She's also argued that a standard review from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, should be beefed up.
Specifically, she led a group of senators in writing a letter that urges the White House to add the Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration to the list of agencies reviewing the deal during the CFIUS process.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa -- who sits on the agriculture panel and has previously battled with Pope as a champion of ethanol subsidies -- was one of the first members of Congress to air concerns with the deal.
"I've always said that we are nine meals away from a revolution, so a safe and sustainable food supply is critical to national security," he said shortly after the acquisition was announced.
For its part, Smithfield has said it welcomes the CFIUS review process, while dismissing the idea that Chinese ownership of the company presents the type of national security problems described by politicians.
"We believe the proposed combination does not present any national security concerns, is good for U.S. farmers and agriculture and will advance US-China relations," said Smithfield spokeswoman Keira Lombardo on Monday.
"We will continue to provide Congress and CFIUS with all the information requested to allow a full and timely review of the combination," she said.
What's also clear is that despite all the reassurances, some lawmakers will continue to raise the specter of national security and food safety concerns, despite what Smithfield says. And the voices don't just come from the Senate.
"We should at least put on the table that there's a national security concern associated with food safety," said Rep. J. Randy Forbes, R-Chesapeake, whose district includes Smithfield's headquarters.
"We've been working very closely with the Senate Ag Committee and the House Ag Committee," Forbes said in an interview with the Daily Press.
Most Popular Stories
- Bipartisan Budget Deal Gets Key Support in House
- Bitcoin Clones Lurch Onto Financial Scene
- Clinton to Keynote Annual Simmons Leadership Conference
- GM to Stop Making Autos in Australia
- Selena Gomez, Shakira Among Top Hispanic Searches
- PhD Project Grooms Business Profs
- How Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies Work
- It's Primary Time in Texas
- How to Survive a Subzero Stranding
- Pacific Trade Pact Delay Hinders U.S. Pivot to Asia