Steady drips of information about a horrific night
in Libya are fueling Republican arguments and ads designed to fire
up the conservative base and undercut the Democrats' early favorite
for president in 2016.
Strategists in both parties disagree on the issue's power to
influence elections next year and beyond. But after eight months of
trying, Democrats are still struggling to move past the terrorist
attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi last Sept. 11
that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Democrats insist that an independent inquiry, the dismissal of
several State Department officials, and nine congressional hearings
leave little new to say on the matter. But Friday turned up the sort
of nuggets that feed conservative activists' belief that a major
scandal may be at hand.
Newly revealed communications show that senior State Department
officials pressed for changes in the talking points that U.N.
Ambassador Susan Rice used a few days after the Benghazi attacks.
These senior officials expressed concerns that Congress might
criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a
growing threat in Libya.
The White House has contended it only made stylistic changes to
the intelligence agency talking points, in which Rice suggested that
spontaneous protests over an anti-Islamic video set off the deadly
attack. The new details suggest a greater degree of political
sensitivity and involvement by the White House and State Department.
Rice and others eventually acknowledged that the Benghazi assault
was a premeditated terrorist attack. Republicans say her Sept. 16
televised remarks were just the start of administration efforts to
mislead Americans about what happened.
The incident was heavily politicized from the start, occurring
less than two months before President Barack Obama's re-election and
while Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state.
The former New York senator and first lady, who infuriates many
conservatives, ranks high in speculation about Democrats in the hunt
for the 2016 presidential nomination.
Friday brought a fresh round of conservative broadsides against
Clinton, Obama and the administration's handling of the Benghazi
matter.
Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a possible Republican presidential
contender, wrote in The Washington Times restating his view that
Obama should have fired Clinton.
Campaigning later in Iowa, Paul said he thinks the attack
"precludes Hillary Clinton from ever holding office."
The conservative group American Crossroads released a 90-second
video asking if Clinton was "part of a cover-up." The video, like
emails and letters from several other groups, asked for political
donations.
Benghazi hands Republicans some political opportunities, although
none without complications. It may be difficult for average voters
to sift through the chronology, assess blame or even follow the
logic of GOP arguments.
For instance, claims that Clinton and others ignored calls for
greater diplomatic security in Libya might be linked to the four
American deaths.
But accusations about the post-attack talking points, which
sometimes seem to dominate the current debate, have nothing to do
with possibly preventing the deaths, thus robbing them of that moral
heft.
Democrats note that an independent inquiry found that the State
Department badly mishandled security needs in Libya. But it blamed
officials no higher than the assistant secretary of state level.
Republican strategist Kyle Downey said Benghazi has exposed a
trove of Democratic vulnerabilities, which might grow as inquiries
continue.
He said Republicans should use the findings to challenge the
competence, truthfulness and judgment of Clinton, Obama and other
administration officials.
Republicans, Downey said, should let the politics play out in
terms of which charges gain the most traction.
Some strategists say the Benghazi narrative may prove more
valuable for congressional Republicans in next year's elections than
in 2016. House Republicans, in particular, can seize on Benghazi to
motivate their base and donors, and to fend off possible primary
challenges from the right.
Democrats say Republicans are exploiting the Benghazi deaths, and
voters won't like it.
"Republicans are a desperate party right now, trying to do
whatever they can to dirty up the president to make some gains in
2014, and to dirty up Secretary Clinton because they're terrified
she'll walk into the White House," said Democratic consultant Doug
Thornell.
White House press secretary Jay Carney has spent hours trying to
dismiss GOP accusations.
"The whole effort here by Republicans to find some hidden mystery
comes to nothing because the president called it an act of terror,"
Carney told reporters Friday.
Originally published by CHARLES BABINGTON Associated Press.
(c) 2013 Tulsa World. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All rights Reserved.
Most Popular Stories
- Tesla Proves EVs Can Be Profitable
- 'Liz & Dick,' 'Cloud Atlas' Among New DVD and Blu-ray Releases
- Hispanics Wanted in STEM Careers
- Repubs Want IRS Probe, Apology
- Economic Forecast Improves for Late 2013
- J.J. Abrams Boldly Going From 'Star Trek' to 'Star Wars'
- Detroit 3 Score High on Auto Quality Survey
- Retail Sales Up in April
- Americans Get Along Well, Despite Politicians
- Gap in Net Worth Grows Between Races in U.S.
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
GOP Smells Gas, Seeks Match in Benghazi Affair
May 13, 2013
Charles Babington, AP
Advertisement
For more stories covering politics, please see HispanicBusiness' Politics Channel
Source: Copyright Tulsa World 2013
Story Tools



