California lawmakers on Tuesday continued to move forward
with efforts to place privacy restrictions on the civilian use of unmanned
aerial systems before the federal government acts to integrate drones into the
national airspace.
"Whether we like drone technology or not, the fact of the matter is it's here,"
said Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Pacoima, as he presented his proposed
privacy-regulation proposal to the Senate Public Safety Committee.
The panel approved SB 15, which would subject operators of unmanned aircraft to
existing civil and criminal penalties that apply to invasion of privacy and
eavesdropping, require law enforcement agencies to obtain a search warrant
before using an unmanned system to obtain evidence, and prohibit any civilian
drone from being equipped with a weapon.
A similar privacy bill was approved last week in the Assembly Public Safety
Committee.
Padilla said California must act now to put policies in place because Congress
and President Barack Obama have instructed the Federal Aviation Administration
to begin allowing unmanned systems into the airspace by 2015, and as many as
10,000 commercial drones are projected to be in the air by 2020.
John Villasenor, a UCLA professor and fellow in the Center for Technology
Innovation at the Brookings Institution, testified that unmanned systems "can be
employed in an endless variety of civil and commercial applications, the
overwhelming number of which are beneficial."
Experts cite such potential uses as the monitoring of agricultural crops,
geologic and marine research, and the inspection of electrical transmission
lines and oil pipelines.
The potential for commercial uses is such that an aeronautics industry group
last month estimated that the unmanned systems industry could generate $82
billion in U.S. economic activity within the first decade after the FAA broadly
authorizes their use.
The FAA is in the process of selecting six testing and development sites
nationwide. Entities from 37 states are competing to become one of those sites.
One of the California applications, which includes partnerships with airports
and businesses around the state, is being led by Ventura County.
Valerie Small Navarro of the American Civil Liberties Union said that while
Padilla's bill is a start toward ensuring Californians' privacy, "some
significant issues remain on the table."
She argued that a "technology that does not give notice of its presence, that is
silent," merits heightened regulations to protect the right of privacy
guaranteed in the California Constitution.
___
(c)2013 Ventura County Star (Camarillo, Calif.)
Visit Ventura County Star (Camarillo, Calif.) at www.vcstar.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
Most Popular Stories
- Fox, Twitter team up to promote TV shows, sell ads
- Guitar Center Sessions Updates on New Episodes Featuring The Smashing Pumpkins, Goo Goo Dolls, OneRepublic and Talib Kweli
- Cinedigm's Docurama Launches New YouTube Channel
- Daily Trivia Byte
- One hot summer
- Stars light up the stage in memory of gentle giant ; REVIEW [Birmingham Mail (UK)]
- Movieline Rolls Out into the Online Video Space
- CELEBRITY BIRTHDAYS [Birmingham Mail (UK)]
- CrowdIt Backs Springfield Area Filmmakers by Offering Complimentary Crowdfunding to Comedy Film Company
- Nikki Hill brings her raw energy and vintage style to Roanoke
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
Ban on Civilian Drones Advances in California
May 1, 2013
Advertisement
For more stories covering politics, please see HispanicBusiness' Politics Channel
Source: Copyright Ventura County Star (CA) 2013
Story Tools



