California's legislative leaders vowed to act with austerity after voters passed billions of dollars in tax hikes last November.
More than two dozen bills introduced in the current session, however, take aim at Californians' pocketbooks.
Taxes, fees or other charges are proposed for soda pop and sweet tea drinkers, motorists, gun owners and people who frequent strip clubs, buy prepaid cellular phone minutes, or use paper or plastic shopping bags.
Businesses are targeted by proposals ranging from an oil severance tax to a manufacturers fee for mattress recycling, and a crackdown on firms that avoid property tax reassessments after ownership changes.
"It doesn't surprise us at all," Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said of the numerous bills. "Our elected political class has an insatiable appetite for even more money."
Added Republican Assemblywoman Shannon Grove of Bakersfield: "Did you ever really expect them to keep their word about fiscal restraint?"
Democrats, who are carrying almost all of the bills, are not using their newly won supermajority to push for sales, income or other across-the-board tax hikes. They are targeting narrower groups instead, attempting to alter what they consider harmful habits or bolster services.
Legislative leaders say there's a big difference between crafting a revenue-raising bill and winning legislative approval and Gov. Jerry Brown's signature.
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg characterizes the process as a giant funnel of ideas, many of which fall by the wayside without becoming law, said Mark Hedlund, Steinberg's spokesman.
"He does not see 2013 as being a year to be looking toward more taxes," Hedlund said.
Some bills would impose a new fee: to build a statewide firearms ownership database, for example, or impose an ignition interlock mandate on convicted drunken drivers.
Other measures would not cost Californians more immediately, but they would extend an existing fee, costing more in the long run.
Assembly Bill 8 would provide an eight-year extension, from 2016 to 2024, for pollution-fighting fees charged as part of vehicle registration.
Looking to the future, a handful of proposed constitutional amendments would ask voters to lower the two-thirds threshold to 55 percent for school parcel taxes and revenue measures for police, fire, library, local transportation, and community and economic development projects.
Assembly Republican leader Connie Conway said the rush of tax and fee bills contradicts the notion that Proposition 30's passage last November would fix California's fiscal problems.
"So was it not true that it was going to fix everything -- or are we now breaking a promise that it was going to be enough?" the Tulare lawmaker said.
"It's disingenuous to say that you're going to be austere and then have bills to raise every tax that anyone can think of," Conway added.
Assembly Speaker John A. Perez, D-Los Angeles, said in a written statement that Brown has made it clear he will not raise taxes without a vote of the people.
"He's never equivocated, and we've never asked him to," Perez said.
"It should come as no surprise that many legislators introduced legislation on fees and taxes for a variety of reasons, as they do every year, and they will go through the legislative process. But at the end of the day, I don't expect to see a flurry of this type of legislation passing."
Most Popular Stories
- SEO Traffic Lab Celebrate Wins at Digital Marketing Event 'Internet World 2013' in London
- Social Media Initiatives Should Follow Customers' Lead
- Apple CEO: Offshore Units Not a 'Tax Gimmick'
- U.S. Senate Accuses Apple of Large-scale Tax Avoidance
- UTEP Water Recycling Project Wins Venture Titles
- Marketo Makes a Mint in IPO: Stock Shoots Up More than 50 Percent
- Bieber Booed at Billboard Awards
- Crude Oil Up, Gasoline Down
- Austin Startup Compare Metrics Raises $3.5 Million for Expansion
- Why So Many Top 'Car Guys' Are Actually Women