State lawmakers heard hours of heated public testimony
last week on the right-to-work question in Missouri.
A key piece of energy legislation, supported by Empire District Electric
Co. and other investor-owned electric utilities, also is being closely
watched.
Discussion on what proponents characterize as the right-to-work issue
began after a bill came before the House Workforce Development and Workplace
Safety Committee. That bill was proposed by state Rep. Eric Burlison,
R-Springfield.
It would bar payment of union dues as a condition of employment and make
Missouri the
nation's 25th right-to-work state. Under existing state law, employees
working at union companies don't have to join the union but are required to
pay dues and fees for the organization's main functions, such as collective
bargaining, under the argument that nonunion employees benefit from union
contracts.
If the legislature passes Burlison's proposal -- and even with a
Republican supermajority that is uncertain -- it would be placed before voters
on an upcoming ballot. That would sidestep the need for Gov. Jay Nixon's
signature. Nixon, a Democrat, opposes the right-to-work bill.
The standing-room-only crowd that spilled into Capitol hallways Wednesday
to watch the hearing included Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, House Speaker
Tim Jones and Minority Leader Jake Hummel, an electrician and member of the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers who participated in the
hearing.
Republicans have upped their push for the policy in recent years. Last
year, state Rep. Bill White, R-Joplin, sponsored a similar measure in the
House, and then-Senate President Pro Tem Rob Mayer sponsored it in the
Missouri Senate, but the effort did not move, mainly because of opposition
from then-House Speaker Steven Tilley.
Democrats are united against the change because of what it could do to
the state's union membership -- a key constituency in Democratic politics.
They claim the bill would allow "freeloaders," those who would benefit from
union representation but not pay for those services. Union representatives
said the legislation also would weaken the rights of workers and decimate the
middle class.
"This legislation is about dividing and fracturing unity," Brian Kelley
said Wednesday. He is the chairman of the Missouri legislative board for the
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen.
Boosting Missouri's economy was a key part of the debate.
State Rep. Mike Kelley, R-Lamar, said three companies that he did not
name chose not to move into his western Missouri district because the state
does not have a right-to-work law.
Democrats argued there could be a variety of other economic factors that
could cause a company to look elsewhere, including transportation
infrastructure.
The committee did not vote on Burlison's measure Wednesday.
House Speaker Jones placed distance between himself and the right-to-work
policy during a statewide tour last December before deciding to co-sponsor it
in January.
Jones said in December that he was concerned about the political reality
of what could be a tough vote for some moderate Republicans in his caucus.
Going through the ballot process, however, eliminates the need for a
Most Popular Stories
- SEO Traffic Lab Celebrate Wins at Digital Marketing Event 'Internet World 2013' in London
- Social Media Initiatives Should Follow Customers' Lead
- Apple CEO: Offshore Units Not a 'Tax Gimmick'
- U.S. Senate Accuses Apple of Large-scale Tax Avoidance
- UTEP Water Recycling Project Wins Venture Titles
- Marketo Makes a Mint in IPO: Stock Shoots Up More than 50 Percent
- Bieber Booed at Billboard Awards
- Crude Oil Up, Gasoline Down
- Austin Startup Compare Metrics Raises $3.5 Million for Expansion
- Why So Many Top 'Car Guys' Are Actually Women
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
Right-to-work Bill, Energy Surcharge Emerge as Key Legislative Issues
Feb 11, 2013
Eli Yokley
Advertisement
Story Tools



