Will they or won't they?
After months of courting, the time is drawing near for Fort Worth-based American Airlines to decide whether to pursue a merger with US Airways, a deal that would have vast consequences for employees and travelers.
With close to 100,000 employees, 1,500 aircraft and $38.7 billion in revenue combined, a marriage of American and US Airways would create the nation's largest airline.
A beefed-up presence in New York would attract business travelers to its larger domestic network. East Coast passengers would have their pick of hubs up and down the seaboard, from Miami to Charlotte, N.C., to Washington, D.C., to New York.
Most importantly, analysts say, the new American would compete better with the two top dogs, United Airlines and Delta Air Lines.
But the proposed deal is not a slam dunk.
American's parent company, AMR Corp., and creditors are still mulling over whether to proceed with a deal while the carrier is in bankruptcy. Questions remain about how much equity in the new company would go to American creditors and US Airways shareholders.
And there's a debate over which CEO - American's Tom Horton or US Airways' Doug Parker - should run the company.
By unveiling its new livery and brand two weeks ago, American's management signaled that it would rather emerge from bankruptcy as a stand-alone carrier and pursue a merger later, some say.
American's unions, which hold three of the nine seats on the unsecured creditors committee, continue to support a merger, as they have since April.
And it appears that Jack Butler, the committee's general counsel, has been facilitating meetings between the carriers for the past few months.
American and US Airways declined to comment on closed-door merger discussions. Horton indicated this month that a decision could come "within weeks," but it remains unclear whether a merger will be announced by early February or a decision will be pushed into the spring. American has asked the Bankruptcy Court to extend its deadline until late April to submit a reorganization plan.
Analysts say a combined American-US Airways would be bigger and in some ways better than either airline can be on its own.
"US Airways has always been a very scrappy operator, and American has been able to reduce its costs, so it will be interesting to see what will happen if they combine," said Henry Harteveldt, a travel industry analyst at Hudson Crossing.
In many airline mergers, flights on overlapping routes are cut and consumers end up paying higher fares because one fewer carrier is serving that market.
But analysts believe that a union between American and US Airways would make a stronger airline without negatively affecting travelers.
"This one isn't going to have much downside for consumers," said Mike Boyd, an aviation analyst at Boyd Consulting.
Their route networks in the top 25 domestic markets have little overlap, he said, and the combined carrier would probably not cut much capacity, meaning airfares would likely remain stable.
The combined company would have hubs in eight markets: New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, Dallas/Fort Worth, Charlotte, Philadelphia and Phoenix.
Analysts expect capacity cuts at Phoenix, while DFW and Charlotte would see increased traffic.
"(Those two hubs) literally blanket Delta's megahub in Atlanta, and that opens up some interesting opportunities," Harteveldt said, adding that the combined entity could increase American's already-strong presence in Latin America.
For American, a merger would give it more market share on the East Coast, where it has lost business in recent years to carriers like JetBlue, particularly in New York.
"US Airways still has a significant number of takeoff and landing slots at LaGuardia, so all of a sudden you can be a serious contender for business travel, and you can have that significant critical mass of flying in and out of LaGuardia that maybe the two airlines on their own aren't able to offer," Harteveldt said.
While a merger would certainly strengthen the domestic network, airline researcher Bill Swelbar believes that US Airways' hubs in Charlotte and Philadelphia are the jewels in a possible combination and would increase American's north-south traffic on the East Coast.
"Charlotte is a wonderful hub," Swelbar said. "It is profitable. It is efficient, and US Airways has been growing that hub to where it is performing very, very well."
For US Airways, the nation's No. 5 carrier, the merger would make it significantly bigger.
Of the four remaining legacy carriers, US Airways is the smallest in revenue, capacity and market share, and it is does not gain the full benefits of being in the Star Alliance, where United has better joint ventures with international partners.
While Wall Street analysts have applauded its efforts to improve profit margins - the carrier posted record revenue and profit in 2012 - investors are concerned that US Airways will lose its competitive edge as labor costs increase and revenue on its smaller network does not.
Most Popular Stories
- Americans Still Pessimistic Despite Economic Growth
- Obama's Delay on Immigration Creates Uncertainty
- Obama on Labor Day: Don't Take Rights for Granted
- New Hershey's Logo Revealed
- Buyer's Remorse on Common Core for Policymakers?
- California Passes First US Statewide Bag Ban
- Mexico's Pemex Forecasts 6.7% Drop in 2014 Crude Production
- American Airlines Back on Obitz
- Echeveste Steps Down, Perez Steps Up at VPE
- Startups Offer Smartphone Banking Apps