David Cronenberg remembers the time Oliver Stone asked him, "David, does it bother you to be such a marginal filmmaker?"
To which Cronenberg, one of Canada's most admired and famous directors, replied, "Well, Oliver, it depends. How big of an audience do you need?"
Therein lies the secret to Cronenberg's success. "Cosmopolis," his new movie opening Friday, is an adaptation of Don DeLillo's novel about a young billionaire named Eric Packer who spends a day in his limo riding around New York City in search of a haircut.
There is practically no traditional plot in "Cosmopolis." More than half the movie takes place inside the limo, where Eric has meetings with his staff, gets a checkup from his doctor ("Your prostate is asymmetrical") and even has sex. Although Eric is played by Robert Pattinson, the hugely popular star of the Twilight series, "Cosmopolis" is a tough sell for the multiplex crowd - a rigorous, challenging and oddly hypnotic movie filled with dense, jargon-heavy dialogue.
At 69, Cronenberg continues to make his heady movies the hard way.
"When you're a filmmaker, you spend a year and a half of your life - maybe more - putting these things together: You have to get your financing in place and you go after actors who will reject you," he says. "It's a difficult process. So the movie has to really excite and intrigue me and make me feel like I'm going to discover something by making it.
"Naturally, you have to tailor the budget to suit the subject matter. No one is going to spend $200 million on 'Cosmopolis.' But if you're realistic about expectations and the size of your audience, and you're willing to work for not that much money, you can come up with very interesting things."
"Cosmopolis'" $20 million price tag still seems high for such an outside-the-box movie, but Cronenberg offset the risk to financiers by casting Pattinson, who appears in every scene. (Colin Farrell was originally set to play Eric, but had to back out due to scheduling conflicts.)
"I got the script out of the blue and was offered the role, which was a little shocking," Pattinson says. "Usually, the movies I am offered straight-up are terrible. This script felt so original, it was almost gleaming.
"I knew there was a movie to be made here. I was just worried that I might not be the one to pull it off. I kept thinking 'There are tons of people better than me for this job!' It took me a while to make peace with that."
"Cosmopolis" offered Pattinson the opportunity to try a kind of minimalist acting he hadn't done before. Eric Packer is a detached, aloof man who rarely expresses what he's feeling. On the page, DeLillo made us privy to his thoughts and interior monologue; on screen Pattinson uses small gestures, the faintest trace of a smile or a frown and the hardening of a stare to convey his inner state.
"At the start of the movie, I am wearing this dark, blank suit," he says. "I am wearing completely blacked-out sunglasses and I'm standing still, not moving. Every tool actors use for their performance has been taken away from me.
"But I felt secure because I knew David was watching me - really watching me - and that gives you confidence. Most of the time on movie sets, I question whether the director is even paying attention to what I'm doing."
Pattinson's legion of "Twilight" fans will be befuddled by this coldly fascinating movie, but Cronenberg has built a sufficient following to ensure an audience for this strange brew.
Not everyone will like it, of course. There isn't a Cronenberg fan on the planet who could honestly say he loves all of the director's movies. And that's a testament to the risks he's taken from the beginning of his 37-year career.
The Toronto native started in the 1970s with a series of gory, low-budget shockers sprinkled with subtle social and political commentary. "The Brood," for example, may be the most disturbing (and gruesome) movie ever made about divorce. And in "Shivers" (retitled "They Came From Within" for its U.S. release), the zombies want to rape rather than devour you.
Those cheap, artful movies were profitable enough to earn Cronenberg bigger budgets, and two early '80s sci-fi pictures heightened his profile: "Scanners," with its infamous exploding head, and "Videodrome," a surreal exploration of voyeurism and technology that featured Deborah Harry as a soft-spoken sadomasochist.
But Cronenberg didn't really enter the mainstream until the one-two punch of "The Dead Zone," a well-received adaptation of the Stephen King novel starring Christopher Walken, and "The Fly," an Oscar-nominated study in body-horror that doubled as a metaphor for AIDS. Their critical and commercial success seemed earn him a perch in the Hollywood echelons, proving he could make technically polished pictures and draw strong performances from actors.
And then he walked away from big pictures and returned to personal ones: "Dead Ringers," his disquieting study of twins (played by Jeremy Irons); "Naked Lunch," a hallucinatory fantasy inspired by William S. Burrough's novel; "M. Butterfly," his disastrous adaptation of the acclaimed play; and "eXistenZ," a sci-fi fantasy about virtual-reality games that, like "Videodrome," seems uncannily prescient today.
The same can be said of DeLillo's 2003 vision of anti-capitalist riots, terrorist attacks and fortunes lost to sudden economic shifts.
"It's amusing to go back and read some of the reviews of that novel, because a lot of the critics said 'Oh, these demonstrations on Wall Street are so unconvincing!'" Cronenberg says. "That stuff seemed like fantasy and made it difficult to relate to. And now, of course, things have changed."
Cronenberg says that when he spoke to DeLillo about the novel, the author revealed the book was born out of mundane questions. "He was interested by the idea of limos. Why would someone have such a long, clumsy vehicle on the tight streets of New York? Where do all those limos go at night? Stuff like that. He wasn't anticipating an economic meltdown when he sat down to write."
For Cronenberg, too, the inspiration to adapt "Cosmopolis" sprang not from grand themes but subtle detail.
"I was simply taken by the dialogue. It's a bit like David Mamet or Harold Pinter, because it's realistic on one level - it sounds like the way people speak ... but it's also very stylized. When I transcribed it into screenplay form, it gave the movie an incredible cohesion and resonance. That's when I asked myself, 'Is this a movie?' And I thought, 'Yes. It's a really interesting movie.'"
Nearly all of the dialogue is lifted from the book, which meant the actors had to sound natural while saying lines like, "We're all young and smart and were raised by wolves. But the phenomenon of reputation is a delicate thing. A person rises on a word and falls on a syllable."
For Pattinson, the unusual cadences and word choices felt liberating.
"I felt a physical connection with the writing - I thought it was so good - and I wanted to read it aloud as soon as I got the script, just to see how it sounded. It is so perfectly written. I loved the fact that I didn't need to put my personal stamp on it as an actor. I just had to perform it in the truest way possible."
Most Popular Stories
- Consumer Prices Edge Up, Surprising Economists
- Market Jolt Offers a Reality Check for Investors
- Clinton Rallies New England Women
- Do Voters Want Compromise?
- Stocks Close Out Best Week in Nearly 2 Years
- Timeline for New York Ebola Doctor
- Ebola in New York, Mali Raises Travel Jitters
- Steris to Add 100 Jobs in Birmingham
- Microsoft Earnings Drive Stocks Higher
- 'Kissing Congressman' Admits Mistake in Reelection Bid