The price of protecting New Jersey from rising sea levels and the devastation
of future storms is breathtaking, making it seem at times that the problem is
insurmountable.
Some options that have been floated include $7.4 billion to buy all
13,300 structures in the Passaic River basin at risk of being flooded by a
catastrophic storm, or $2.7 billion for a tunnel to protect Wayne and other
towns by guiding storm runoff out to Newark Bay.
While the huge engineering projects garner much of the attention, some
experts argue that less glamorous, lower-priced and smaller-scale initiatives
replicated over a wide area can often produce dramatic results. Many of these
strategies -- from rebuilding beaches and dunes that have been scoured away by
waves, to improved building codes that help structures withstand storms --
have already proved effective in New Jersey.
The specifics of certain proposals can be debated, but most agree
something needs to be done.
Just in the past year or so, the state has been hammered by unusually
intense storms that have caused damage in very different ways. Sandy pounded
the Jersey Shore and the state's electrical grid while swamping Moonachie and
Little Ferry as well as the region's largest sewage treatment plant. In August
of 2011, Hurricane Irene caused historic flooding along the Passaic River. The
October snowstorm of 2011 downed trees and put much of North Jersey in the
dark.
"The results of Sandy were devastating and it wasn't even a Category 1
hurricane when it hit," said Lisa Auermuller, a watershed coordinator at
Rutgers University's Institute for Marine and Coastal Sciences. "Storms are
likely to be more severe over time. And with sea level rise, even regular
tides are going to be higher. Some shore communities are already seeing that."
President Obama on Friday asked Congress for more than $60 billion to
help states affected by Sandy recover and rebuild -- a figure that includes
funding for some of the infrastructure projects local leaders say are needed
to prevent future storm-related devastation.
When Governor Christie recently announced that New Jersey's cleanup and
recovery from Sandy will cost $37 billion, he included more than $7 billion
for projects to protect against future storms. If Congress approves those
funds, it could help defray the costs of a wide array of strategies in areas
across the state, including flood-prone parts of North Jersey.
Rebuilding the Jersey Shore to handle storm surges, meanwhile, could
require billions of dollars to replenish beaches swept away during superstorm
Sandy, erect steel bulkheads at $3 million or more a pop, rebuild damaged
seawalls, elevate thousands of homes on pilings, and buy out some
neighborhoods.
Making the New Jersey transit system more resilient to storms could cost
$800 million, and putting electric lines underground could average $724,000
per mile.
But experts caution that big engineering projects can have unintended
consequences. "You can solve a problem for one group and create a problem for
another," said Tom O'Rourke, a Cornell University engineering professor. "We
need to engage people, recognize there will be winners and losers, but
optimize our solutions so there are as few losers as possible."
Smaller-scale projects -- like improved building codes along the Jersey
Most Popular Stories
- Supreme Court Rules Against Arizona Registration Law
- Entries for the 2013 Social Media Leadership Awards
- Guns Are Hot in California
- George Zimmerman Arrest Viewed Differently According to Race
- Edward Snowden Wrong About Hong Kong, Some in Territory Say
- El Paso Symposium Offers Help to Startups
- U.K. Spied on G20 Emails, Phone Calls
- Social Media in the Public Sector
- Icelandic Whalers Head Out to Sea
- Boeing, Airbus Vie for Big Orders at Paris Air Show
News-To-Go
Advertisement
Advertisement
News Column
Protecting North Jersey From Future Storms Could Cost Billions
Dec. 10, 2012
James M. O'Neill, The Record (Hackensack, N.J.)
Advertisement
Story Tools



