The underlying concern, for both the industry and regulators, is
about the data collection and data mining mechanisms that facilitate
digital marketing on apps and Web sites for children.
Washington is pushing Silicon Valley on children's privacy, and Silicon Valley is pushing back.
Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Twitter have all objected to portions of a government effort to strengthen online privacy protections for children. In addition, media giants like Viacom and Disney, cable operators, marketing associations, technology groups and a trade group representing toy makers are arguing that the Federal Trade Commission's proposed rule changes seem so onerous that rather than enhance online protections for children, they threaten to deter companies from offering children's Web sites and services altogether.
"If adopted, the effect of these new rules would be to slow the deployment of applications that provide tremendous benefits to children and to slow the economic growth and job creation generated by the app economy," Catherine A. Novelli, vice president of worldwide government affairs at Apple, wrote in comments to the agency.
But the underlying concern, for both the industry and regulators, is not so much about online products for children themselves. It is about the data collection and data mining mechanisms that facilitate digital marketing on apps and Web sites for children -- and a debate over whether these practices could put children at greater risk.
In 1998, Congress passed the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act in an effort to give parents control over the collection and dissemination of private information about their children online. The regulation, known as Coppa, requires Web site operators to obtain a parent's consent before collecting personal details, like a home address or e-mail address, for a child younger than 13.
Now, U.S. regulators are preparing to update that rule, arguing that it has not kept pace with advances like online behavioral advertising, a practice that uses data mining to tailor advertising to people's online behavior. The F.T.C. wants to expand the types of data whose collection requires prior parental permission to include persistent identification systems, like unique device codes or customer code numbers stored in cookies, if those codes are used to track children online for advertising purposes.
The idea is to preclude companies from compiling dossiers on the online activities -- and by extension the health, socioeconomic status, race or romantic concerns -- of individual children across the Web over time.
"What children post online or search as part of their homework should not haunt them as they apply to colleges or for jobs," Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts and co- chairman of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, said in a recent phone interview. "YouTube should not be turned into YouTracked."
The agency's proposals have provoked an intense reaction from some major online operators, television networks, social networks, app platforms and advertising trade groups. Some argue that the F.T.C. has overstepped its mandate in proposing to expand the rule's scope greatly. Others say that using identification systems like customer code numbers to track children "anonymously" online is
Most Popular Stories
- Facebook, Twitter Announce Apps for Google Glass
- Will Yahoo Splurge on $1-Billion acquisition of Tumblr?
- European Car Sales up First Time in 20 Months
- 'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Return of Khan?
- Google Fiber Making an Impact
- Entrepreneurs Chase Social Media
- Exciting Night for UFC Fans
- Teen Drivers Should Be Prepared for Any Car-Related Situation
- Summer Movies Aimed at Young Men, Teen Boys
- RFD-TV launches on Charter Cable