The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear four new cases, Scotusblog reported.
-- Trevino vs. Thaler on whether people convicted of crimes will get a new chance to argue their attorneys in state court did not provide adequate representation.
-- McQuiggins vs. Perkins on whether a person's claim of innocence can be a legitimate excuse for not filing a federal habeas challenge on time
-- PPL Corporation vs. Commissioner seeking clarification on how the foreign tax credit is calculated by the Internal Revenue Service
-- Bullock vs. BankChampaign on whether misconduct by a bankruptcy trustee can affect how debts are discharged.
Also, the court:
-- Asked the U.S. Solicitor General to submit the government's views on whether the 1968 Fair Housing Act covers claims that minority renters or buyers were negatively affected by housing policy.
-- Took no action on a petition in Shelby County vs. Holder for a ruling on the constitutionality of Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The court is waiting to receive the full records of proceedings on the case in lower courts.
Most Popular Stories
- High-Tech Home Theaters Undergoing a Revolution
- Hollywood Bets Big Again on Summer Movies
- Bernanke Wishes He'd Explained the Crisis Better
- China Slows Down: The Cohen Column
- Nestle, Superior Grocers Promote Healthy Meals
- EPA Eases Back on Biofuels Mandate
- Biden Leaves Ukraine as Russian Invasion Threat Rises
- Stocks See 6th Gain in a Row on Solid Earnings
- Ellen DeGeneres Producing HGTV Series
- IRS Awards Bonuses to Employees Who Owe Back Taxes