The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear four new cases, Scotusblog reported.
-- Trevino vs. Thaler on whether people convicted of crimes will get a new chance to argue their attorneys in state court did not provide adequate representation.
-- McQuiggins vs. Perkins on whether a person's claim of innocence can be a legitimate excuse for not filing a federal habeas challenge on time
-- PPL Corporation vs. Commissioner seeking clarification on how the foreign tax credit is calculated by the Internal Revenue Service
-- Bullock vs. BankChampaign on whether misconduct by a bankruptcy trustee can affect how debts are discharged.
Also, the court:
-- Asked the U.S. Solicitor General to submit the government's views on whether the 1968 Fair Housing Act covers claims that minority renters or buyers were negatively affected by housing policy.
-- Took no action on a petition in Shelby County vs. Holder for a ruling on the constitutionality of Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The court is waiting to receive the full records of proceedings on the case in lower courts.
Most Popular Stories
- Hezbollah Chief's Assassination Claimed by Sunni Group
- U.S. Growth Stayed Steady During Shutdown, Fed Says
- Allstate Seeks to Invest in Minority Firms
- Newtown Massacre Heard on 911 Recordings
- SpaceX's Satellite Launch Is 'Game-Changer'
- Latin Music Conference Turns 25
- Climate Change Early Warning System Urged
- Guardian Pressured to Stop NSA Stories: Editor
- New Home Sales Shoot up 25 Percent in October
- Reid Confident Congress to Pass Immigration Bill