Amid a chorus of citizens complaints, Miami-Dade commissioners approved a measure Tuesday that allows for a one-time break for residents hit with mysteriously high water bills.
The measure, sponsored by Commissioner Jose "Pepe'' Diaz, allows the water and sewer director to reduce inexplicably high bills.
The ordinance applies only to future bills at least six times the customer's average tab. The county already had similar relief available for customers who prove hidden leaks created a high bill.
The consumer-friendly item was part of a packed agenda in which commissioners also approved new labor contracts, shot down a proposed straw ballot on casino gambling and brainstormed about pressing the Florida Legislature for control over gambling issues in Miami-Dade County.
But the measure, which does not apply retroactively, did not go far enough to satisfy residents who were socked with huge bills in the past.
"This won't do anything at all for me," said Cynthia Potter, a South Dade resident who along with citizen activist Diane Lawrence urged the commission to make the ordinance retroactive.
In July 2010, Potter was saddled with a $6,222 water bill, nearly $6,000 above the typical $280 tab for three months service at her three-bedroom, two-bath home. After filing a lawsuit, she settled for $2,651, which she is paying off in $74-a-month installments that stretch to 2014.
"We'll have to keep trying," said Lawrence, who has been pressing county officials to act on the issue for months.
The measure, approved 10-0, would allow for cutting the excess portion of a water bill in half and eliminating any overage in sewer charges. The county estimates the move will cost $2 million in revenue a year.
Commissioner Lynda Bell had pressed her colleagues to make the measure retroactive in consideration of citizens such as Potter, but failed to win support.
In other action Tuesday, the commission voted 8-5 against a proposal by Chairman Joe Martinez to place a nonbinding straw ballot on the Jan. 31 ballot to gauge voters' views on the hot topic of destination resort casinos in Miami-Dade. Several commissioners said it makes more sense to seek voters' input once details of proposed projects have crystalized and the legislature has acted.
Commissioners Martinez, Jean Monestime, Javier Souto, Xavier Suarez and Bell voted in favor of the straw ballot. Voting against were Bruno Barreiro, Esteban Bovo, Diaz, Dennis Moss, Sally Heyman, Audrey Edmonson, Barbara Jordan and Rebeca Sosa.
Separately Tuesday, the commission hammered out more details of a letter the panel plans to send to the state legislature, staking its position that the county take the lead in decision-making on casino gambling. The county attorney is finalizing the letter.
Also on Tuesday, the panel approved without discussion new labor agreements for Miami-Dade Police officers and supervisors, and for aviation and general employees represented by AFSCME Local 1542.
On Dec. 19, the commission is set to take up an issue that went to impasse during contract negotiations with the Police Benevolent Association: whether officers will have to contribute an additional 5 percent toward their healthcare coverage, boosting their total contribution to 10 percent. It also will consider approving an agreement with AFSCME Local 199, if those union members ratify a tentative contract Dec. 16.
The county, which had hoped to have concessionary labor pacts in place a month ago, is slowly inching toward agreements with all its 10 employee groups.
On Thursday, professional and supervisory employees represented by the Government Supervisor Association of Florida Local 100 will vote on a new contract proposal after rejecting an earlier version. "So far, it seems pretty hopeful,'' said GSAF Local 100 president Greg Blackman.
The county still must obtain agreements with employees in the solid waste, water and sewer, and transit departments.
Also Tuesday, the commission gave preliminary approval to a redistricting plan that moves the commission's district boundaries. A public hearing is set for Dec. 19.
Separately, a selection committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its original vendor choice for $300 million in new Metrorail cars despite concerns raised by federal regulators.
The committee voted 2-1 in favor of AnsaldoBreda. The panel members emphasized they weren't favoring AnsaldoBreda because the firm plans to build a facility in Miami-Dade to assemble the railcars.
The panel was reconvened to reconsider its original decision after regulators ruled this month that the county had violated federal rules in picking the firm, a unit of Finmeccanica, based in Italy.
Regulators, who reviewed the matter after getting a complaint from the competing bidder, CAF-USA, said the county improperly favored AnsaldoBreda because it plans to assemble the railcars locally.
The county is planning to replace 136 aging Metrorail cars.
Federal regulators told the county Nov. 23 that it must reconsider the two "best and final offers" without giving weight to that local preference or the project would be ineligible to receive federal funds.
CAF's vice president of marketing and business development, Jitendra Tomar, said the company plans to challenge the committee's decision, asserting the panel didn't reevaluate the bids in earnest, as federal regulators had directed. "We're not giving up," Tomar said.
The matter still needs approval by the county commission.
CAF-USA, based in Elmira, N.Y., is a unit of Spain's Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles.
Most Popular Stories
- SEO Traffic Lab Celebrate Wins at Digital Marketing Event 'Internet World 2013' in London
- Social Media Initiatives Should Follow Customers' Lead
- Apple CEO: Offshore Units Not a 'Tax Gimmick'
- U.S. Senate Accuses Apple of Large-scale Tax Avoidance
- UTEP Water Recycling Project Wins Venture Titles
- Marketo Makes a Mint in IPO: Stock Shoots Up More than 50 Percent
- Bieber Booed at Billboard Awards
- Crude Oil Up, Gasoline Down
- Austin Startup Compare Metrics Raises $3.5 Million for Expansion
- Why So Many Top 'Car Guys' Are Actually Women