News Column
Story Tools

Del.icio! del.icio.us

Digg It! Digg It!

E-Mail! E-Mail to a Friend

Print! Printable Version

Comment! Comments

Susan Boyle and Adam Lambert: Too Polarizing a Pair?

June 1, 2009

HispanicBusiness.com Staff

susan boyle, adam lambert, second place, conventional wisdom



There's an old saying in politics that "conventional wisdom is always wrong." After the 2008 presidential election, Hillary Clinton knows this all too well.

But can the same be said for entertainment and culture? Take a look at Susan Boyle and Adam Lambert.

The two singers burst onto the national stage in 2009 with amazing performances on Britain's Got Talent and American Idol, respectively.

Both were heralded as stars and appeared on a path toward victory. Both, however, placed second in the wildly popular talent shows.

While their losses may feel like shockers, the rise and fall of the two cultural icons have some similarities.

They were critics' choices, which are not necessarily a measure of public sentiment.

Although Lambert and Boyle were clearly more original and unique than the winners, they also sparked visceral contempt among some viewers.

In politics, they call it high negatives and high favorables, meaning the people who loved Lambert and Boyle practically worshipped them; but the people who disliked the two did so with a sense of rage behind their opposition.

Clinton, the would-be-first-female president, suffered the same fate. The people who backed her absolutely loved her. But her opponents despised her. In other words, there was no one in the middle.

Whenever outcomes are determined through Democratic vote -- or in the case of these two shows where the public has the majority voice -- the conventional wisdom of the pundits is almost always wrong. More often than not - the public chooses the middle.

In the case of Idol, millions of voters chose Kris Allen -- a talented, middle-of-the-road, easy listening average, everyday man. Boyle lost to a bunch of easily digestible, talented kids in a dance group called "Diversity."

Another factor in their unlikely losses is the fact that voters are essentially lazy. When they believe their favorite has no shot of losing, they take Democracy for granted. In this case, they assume their favorites will win simply because they are the talk of the Internet.

In the end, life will go on for crushed fans and stunned contestants.

Clinton became Secretary of State; Lambert is probably the most famous Idol contestant ever and will grace the cover of "Rolling Stone" magazine soon; and Boyle? Well, she won't perform for the queen like "Diversity" will, and she checked into a hospital after the loss to get treatment for the stress she endured throughout the show, but conventional wisdom tell us that Boyle will rebound, somehow.



Source: HispanicBusiness.com (c) 2009. All rights reserved.


Comments

Total Comments: 2 | Pending Comments: 0

faye
6/3/2009 2:39:01 AM PST
Kitty your comment is appalling. Susan Boyle did not have the pressure from the UK, it came from around. She is more of a sensational everywhere else than she is here. what is more, she sang terribly in the semi-finals and came across as very weird and aloof in the finals. she wasn't likeable in the end. I personally think she should have won but two years ago, we had a fuddy duddy "unlike;ly" singer win - Paul Potts. That's probably why she didnt win. And diversity's rountine was the best of the night - even simon cowell said so. As for Adam Lambert...he was clealy more talented than Kris and it goes to show these things aren't talent competitions anymore. AND THE TRUTH IS ADAM IS NO AS MAINSTREAM AS KRIS. That is why Kris won. It doesn't and shouldnt take anything away from Adam though.


kittycomere
6/1/2009 5:42:42 PM PST
Susan Boyle won't "spring back." She is simple. Whe had brain damage as a child. Whe lives ina village. While we all want to see that as a fairy tale, Adam lives and worked the American Dream. The American Dream just doesn't happen. It takes drive and confidence. Adam is an Idol in a time we couldn't believe anymore. His lost is due to the balck-president backlash, Christain-conservatism, homophobic, not-in-my-backyard, non-conforming bullshit that all we Americans have to deal with. Susan Boyle never had "pressure" on that level.




Story Tools

Del.icio! del.icio.us

Digg It! Digg It!

E-Mail! E-Mail to a Friend

Print! Printable Version

Comment! Comments